How is this even going to work in practice anyway. Even the strictest anti-abortion states seem to permit abortion in the case where a mother's life is threatened. Giving complete protection simply because of a heartbeat is too simplistic.
How is this even going to work in practice anyway. Even the strictest anti-abortion states seem to permit abortion in the case where a mother's life is threatened. Giving complete protection simply because of a heartbeat is too simplistic.
Cool, so when are you going to infract the users in this thread? You're always hot to trot to infract myself and other conservative posters.
- - - Updated - - -
Cool, so when are you going to infract the users in this thread? You're always hot to trot to infract myself and other conservative posters.
Don't think there is an echo chamber here. There's people with a functioning frontal cortex to which they have the ability to use their higher cognitive thinking skills. Then there's people who use circular arguments, argue their opinions are facts and use duck speak. I've seen conservatives and progressives in both camps. I just prefer to find out earlier rather than later than I'm having a discussion with the latter, so I can disengage and keep my sanity.
To the OP, as I already mentioned, it will be found unconstitutional just like all the other laws republicans spew out.
Has nothing to do with disagreement. Has to do with if i posted the same "flaming"/"trolling" post I'd be infracted. Endus has a boner for infracting the conservative posters in this forum. Would love to see him actually do his job as moderator and hold his liberal buddies to the same rules.
- - - Updated - - -
Cool, so when are you going to infract the users in this thread? You're always hot to trot to infract myself and other conservative posters.
this has nothing to do with religion or women's rights and everything to do with protecting unborn children. aborting a child is infact killing it but most people would try to convince themselves otherwise. if you cant raise a baby don't have sex there are many other alternatives that won't cause you to produce a child.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Because Endus and the other mods obviously has nothing better to do than to categorize the users of this forum in a list that is the political equivalent of Santa Claus's naughty and nice people list.
That doesn't sound ridiculous to you?
Handing the infractions based on your avatar is just as likely to me.
Shit, just realized Endus still has that christmas cap on his avatar. Maybe it is true after all.
Last edited by Santti; 2017-01-16 at 10:20 PM.
naw.. human life is not more sacred than any other form of life and we habitually kill other life forms without any wavering in our conscience or morals. saying that our country was created to fulfill certain rights that were given by god is just stupid and the obvious dumbshit thing you have to say when youre a politician with a religious *read christian/catholic/wahtever theyre all the same jesus freaks* base.
There's also nothing stopping Blizzard from resurrecting both Arthas and Archimonde and turning them into super saiyans so that they can fuse and fight Sargeras
We do. Your issue is that a fetus isn't a human being, and thus isn't a person.
And a human fetus fails to pass those kinds of tests in early terms. Homeostasis is the big one; the fetus can't self-regulate its own systems until after the 20th week or so.We can scientifically distinguish between a piece of flesh and an organism, as well as between a dead corpse and a live human being.
If this even mattered, which again, it really doesn't, since even if we granted a fetus personhood to make some people feel better, it still wouldn't grant the fetus any right to abrogate the woman's body rights.