But it IS pointless. Like any bloated organisation that is beset with competing interests it has become paralysed with bureaucracy. It's a global version of the failed EU.
But here, take this opportunity to defend the UN and tell us how it stopped the Syrian war. Or any war for that matter. Maybe the Korean war? I honestly can't think of anything this waste of money has done that is worthwhile. People die from wars, famine and curable diseases and the UN, at great expense, does nothing but "talk" about it.
And China and Russia rejoiced! Yaaaay
Even the most skeptical people identify that the UN is a platform for bigger nations posturing for influence over smaller nations. It is, if nothing else, a platform for the US to lord over the fact that put over 200 states in the same room, and America politically holds the biggest stick.
There are very few things I enjoy more than people prostrating that the knowledge they have of the UN couldn't fill a small saucer, much less be enough to hold any sort of meaningful discussion over it.
- - - Updated - - -
Criticism born of ignorance. Just as a tiny portion, WIPO, as one of the most prominent parts of the UN insofar as American interests are concerned, is based almost purely on protecting the intellectual property of developed nations especially in terms of its pharmaceutical and branding aspects, with just as one example being the prominent body involved in resolving the AIDS medication dispute when Brazil tried to say that they shouldn't have to respect American patent laws for live saving medication.
The World Bank is essentially authorized purchasing of influence.
ECOSOC is largely a platform for larger scale coordination of economic pacts, such as the US getting people on board for the TPP, and is dominated by regional economic powers.
Just as a few examples.
Last edited by Kasierith; 2017-01-23 at 02:37 AM.
Then they can start a website forum and discuss things for far less. Outside of the P5 you really don't have much of a voice. Like the p5 countries can avoid punishment for bad behavior while the rest have to deal with it. The UN has no army to enforce anything. But you still want some very overpriced "discussion forum?"
So America wants to leave something they helped create?
America is fucked in the head
Yup. Anyone that thinks that voting for Trump was a vote against the Status Quo is misinformed. And it doesn't matter if you drain a swamp if all you do is just put more dirty water from a different pond. Its still a swamp.
Thing is the protests are great example of how the "ones in charge" have us divided and fighting against each other. And not really looking at the issues and such in an intelligent light. Its all how are emotions play into it.
Well that's not entirely true. The UN budget is split up between all the members with them determining how much of the bill each country has to pay. The US is always #1 on that list with the highest bill, usually around $3B a year. So a $3B a year bill is a good reason in the not to be category.
Although this "leave the UN" bill has been filed every year for the last 20 years, this is probably the best chance now it's ever had of passing. All they need is a simple majority in the House and Senate and for Trump to sign it (pretty sure he would, he's been vocal in his dislike of the UN). So without a single Democrat vote it could be passed.