Trump says something negative about somebody, or makes ridiculous claim such as "3 million illegals cost me the popular vote" and his supporters blindly follow and quote it as gospel with literally nothing to back it up.
Major news outlet trusted for generations posts breaking story with proven facts and numerous sources/citations and is and always has been fake news.
Even if you support Trump, how can you not find it a little convenient that every negative statement regarding him is "conveniently" fake news? We're really going to sit here and say that the New York Times and *countless* other news organizations are in a massive conspiracy to discredit him? Even if they openly disliked Trump, do you really think this is the first time a news source has disliked a politician? It may lead to bias, it may lead to pushing stories harmful to them while putting less emphasis on others, but the only news outlets that willingly promote genuinely fake stories are the ones that TRUMP CITES TO BACK UP HIS INSANITY. Seriously, the only "fake news" out there is the news that Trump references to back up his absurd claims, and it's so fucking obvious that I genuinely feel sorry for the sheep that mindlessly believe his insanity. Think for yourself, man. Just use some common sense and think about these things in general - does it seem a little odd? Does it seem a little convenient? It just might be! (hint: it is)