This is fantastic. Let the left-wing cucks in Europe get what they fucking deserve. Enjoy your Islamic refugees.
This is fantastic. Let the left-wing cucks in Europe get what they fucking deserve. Enjoy your Islamic refugees.
Germany does not need refugees, they need immigration, big difference. Not to mention there are many germans who do these shit jobs, it is just that they tend not to have many children , which threatens the entire social system to collapse unless the population stays at a certain level.
Wow, so this probably is this "alternative facts" they all talk about. So the article is basically about speedy and more deportation. At the end, the information gets mixed in, that in order to stop population decline, X immigrants are needed. And then the conclusion is drawn, which makes up the title. WTF, seriously? And that shit believe people? So if someone were to say "there are too many people on the earth" and on another occasion it is said "the USA have been on the moon" that equals to the breaking news: USA realizing settlements on the moon. Please, please. Start thinking on your own and don't simply take everything you get fed for real. Draw you own conclusions and be aware of your own biases - or those of the reporting party...
Letting in worker immigrants can be seen as liberal, but liberalism is still not left-wing.
Can we stop going in circles? Either explain how letting in immigrants to work is left wing, or dont bother.
the 'liberal' part in liberal-conservative can also refer to economic policies, which is the case for most countries around here.
This is so fake. Especially with Votings this year in germany, Merkel switched some of her views in the last interviews already...of course they state something like this right now. Cmon guys.
It doesn't work, people may want children but they do not want to take care of children. Here we've got 2 years leave, can be split anyway you want between the spouses, paid 85% of your paycheck and birthrate is still low, and we have a lot of people that do have children - people that would never bother with a condom, with low education, with archaic views where the wife is supposed to stay at home.
When both spouses have active lives and interests and the money to pursue their interests children become a secondary issue. The only way to increase birthrates is changing the society so that having a child and dumping them in daycare from day 1, whenever you want, is an accepted norm. Basically to have children without changing your life, at most paying something (but not too much). It sounds like a horrible idea but it would work.
Having a child is not a death sentence for a woman's body or career, you recover, you can work until late into the pregnancy. But it's for people that somehow want a change of life, want to give their time to raising a child, nowadays that's not many people, not when you have other options.
For people that barely scrape a living, work all day to pay the basics and have no options but to stay at home a child can be a release, something to bring some meaning to their lives; when you already have other ways to relax and enjoy yourself, a child is too high a cost for some.
Liberal conservatives are just more liberal conservatives, now depending on the country you´re talking about that means they are more or less to the left than conservatives, that however doesn´t automatically make them always support liberal stances, because they still predominantly are conservatives.
Seriously it´s a term you have to use with the country in mind not what the term is defined by because it depends on how liberal the country already is.
Yes I understand that.
I could point you to the laws in question, but that wouldnt really help you unless you'd have both a somewhat founded education in both the german language and german law as well as an understanding of the context, such as how is the law being used in practice by the administrative bodies.
There are good articles in what others would refer to as "msm" that give a more comprehensive look at things though. In essence, and to answer the initial question you posed, In pracitce, when it comes to what existing legislation is setting the standarts and is affecting immingration to a degree to qualify as "controling" immigration: We dont really have one.
https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommenta...eberhaupt.html
Well they are allowed to take up work. But they dont. Theres plenty of data as well as reports on that already.
How is an influx of people, many of which dont even want to take up jobs that require sacrifice and hard work, even more that arent qualified for work that isnt subsidized and a vast majority that will not be employable in a self sustaining fashion a good thing for Germany?
The difference is that the process happens for the native population throughout their lives - school, highschool, college, etc. Even then not everyone is successful so you have people failing.
1. Increase birth rates to keep population growth
Instead of investing money for year by hear fixes that cause more problems than they fix use them to support increase of birth rates, even temporary.
2. Get rid of aging population
Never going to happen since life spans are increasing. To decrease the average age though encouraging new births will help more than importing refugees(0/1 year olds are younger than what are basically grown men).
Don't waste money for fixes that cause more problems than they fix, waste money trying to find solutions.