It's funny. In various academic spheres, the concern is the far-reaching, and long off issue of The Singularity. The fact is, the idea of robotics and automation in general, will have a MUCH more direct impact on society and the workforce.
when you look at the history and evolution of things like Cars: the internal combustion engine to the electric engine. The automatic transmission, Limited Slip differential, GPS.. Car building: Hand built, to assembly line, to assembly robotics, to near total automation. Computers: large, massively unwieldy and super-sensitive monsters that took up who whole rooms, down to devices the size of an average persons hand being able to do most of what a full-size desktop can do. Computers now building computers that are faster than they were. Computers performing more and more complex tasks designed to do more and more of the mundane tasks humans used to do.
The irony: We need to make the system more advanced, so that it can do less advanced/more repetitive tasks.
The moral being: Automation is inevitable, and it will be a massive shock to society each time it impacts more and more industries. Transportation, assembly, general manufacturing.. farming.. yes, farming too. Fewer people needed to tend larger fields thanks to all sorts of automation. How fast should it happen? What should we do about it? Do we try to throttle advancement? Can we? What are we going to do when the majority what jobs remain in this country.. or eventually the world.. will basically come down to "repair of X machine/robot". I don't think it will happen in my lifetime (36yrs old), will probably be in it's large scale infance in my daughter(s) (12 and 6)... basically it will be a few generations before this becomes the mainstream. But I do think we need to start addressing these things now.. not after McDonalds rolls out the McFry cook.
Last edited by bowchikabow; 2017-03-09 at 06:56 PM.
"When you build it, you love it!"
Trying to link this article up to your lame opinion about a $15 min wage doesn't work. The industry didn't decide to invest in robots because workers want a fair wage, they decided to invest in robots years and years ago because they want to replace workers with robots as soon as the robots are cheap enough.
I wish i knew the OP job so i can protest each year in front of it to prevent him from getting a raise, because whatever product HIS company sells i don't want to pay more money for.
come on tell us...please....
Same logic, you don't want these people having higher minimum wages because you don't want to pay 5 cents more for a burger.
As everyone else have piled on, this has nothing to do with 15 dollar advocates.
Lets see i think these people make WAY more then 15 dollar advocates do.
https://www.ft.com/content/84bb5c72-...5-82a9b15a8ee7
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/m...ll-street.html
The Robots
Are Coming
for Wall Street
Hundreds of financial analysts are being replaced
with software. What office jobs are next?
maybe they had the balls to ask for a raise????
- - - Updated - - -
oh i think these people make waaaaaaaaaaaaay less then 15 dollars an hour and even they are being replaced by robots
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36376966
Foxconn replaces '60,000 factory workers with robots'
These guys make way more then 15
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/o...105-story.html
Employing a human welder in a factory in the U.S. costs about $25 per hour including benefits, according to a 2015 study by the Boston Consulting Group; that drops to just $8 per hour for a robot, including installation, operating costs and maintenance. By 2030, "the operating cost per hour for a robot doing similar welding tasks could plunge to as little as $2 when improvements in performance are factored in," BCG said.
scary read
http://www.mckinsey.com/business-fun...-they-cant-yet
Last edited by Zan15; 2017-03-09 at 07:07 PM.
They believe they're going to be big time millionaires one day, or at least firmly upper class at 250k+, but in reality all those disenfranchised middle class workers who lost their jobs over the last two decades are very quickly headed towards minimum wage jobs themselves. All of this governmental dismantling and destruction that they're cheering on, and removal of regulation, is having a very clear impact on pushing wages down.
So really, they aren't going to need to ally themselves with lower class minimum earners... because they're going to be there anyway.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
This is by design. While the wealthy are the real ones creating job and wage stagnation, they've created rhetoric and propaganda that makes the poorly educated worship wealth, and blame anyone making less than them.
"The poor are paid too much, thus taking away money from us rich people, who give you middle classers your jobs, and while the reality is that we can pay you more and we aren't going to, what we're going to tell you is that the poor and immigrants are at fault for you being stuck on hard times. Now I'm going to go laugh at you on my fifth yacht."
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
For those who thought there is no Mopping Machine...
http://store.irobot.com/default/robot-mop-braava/
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
give those robots a month before the sensors are all gobbed up and they have to pay some dude making 40 dollars an hour to clean or replace them.
oh and can you imagine the health problems with all that grease and meat particles in those joints.
Robots are replacing everyone anyway, they are replacing factory workers in china that already have slave wages. $7.25 or $15 doesnt matter, if a robot can replace it, then itll get replaced regardless.
Engineers are smart enough to test robots under working conditions before deploying them en mass.
https://www.ibm.com/watson/
Not really.
This type of thinking was the reason behind industrial revolution happening in Britain and not Japan.
Last edited by HumbleDuck; 2017-03-09 at 08:50 PM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
40 years ago or so it was a different picture. Unions were strong, parliaments had all the power' working people were receiving wage increases and making demands of employers and the gap between the highest paid ceo and the lowest worker was incredibke small relative to today. The rich decided that was too good so they funded what amounted to a market friendly revolution.
- - - Updated - - -
The first one is incredible important and its stupid that people think the exact amount of jobs will still be there. Why bother investing in robots if you need to hire as many people to maintain them? The entire point is to increase effeciency by removing the dependance on human labor. Why do you then think you will have as much human labor?