Yeah. My major gripe about the books isn't the plot or characterization, rather the plodding and overly methodical style of writing. There were some changes in the TV series that I enjoyed and some that I didn't, I really enjoyed the storyline change regarding Xaro Xhoan Daxos for example.
I found the same thing with Tolkein when I read it compared to the films.
Tolkein and Martin are excellent world builders, but between Tolkein described every branch of a tree and Martin extolling the virtues of every dish on a lords feasting table, it can get a bit tiresome.
But..........that's what books are.
While I like the world building and exploration. Martin plods and loses any focus in feasts and dance when this was already an acquired taste in the earlier books.
Comparing JRRT to GRRM they're on a very different scale of page count tough.
Tolkien wrote lord of the ring in a 1204 page combibed book (it was only split due to the publisher/paper shortage after WW2).
Dance alone clocks in at 1117 pages, and that's actaully like 3/4 quarters of abook with all the characters missing. Itss one book with very little "main story " progression. Mostly because of the earlier loss of focus. In splitting all his main characters and giving them all new equally well developed side characters to interact with, and "side" stories of their own nothing moves at any speed.
Tolkien did a lot of world building in apppendices and side world building book( multiple books if you count his sons series on writing the world, hugely interesting if you wanna about the process but it is rahter niche). I think GRRM should really look at that for examples. Why did we need the "soiled knight" dorn stroryline to be that expansive for a failed plot ,or huge travelogues through the riverlands/essos full of stories barely worth mentioning in the long run, Val saying "words are wind" and ""You know nothing Jon snow". It's not pointless but some these should have had way less pages devoted to them or a side book outside the main series. I know a lot of people who like the story but can't get through the books due to slow individual story progression.
For the whole White Walkers shouldn't risk being anywhere near the battle thing: maybe they have to be a certain range for their reanimated corpses to stay "alive"?
Eh, they're dumb overconfident supernatural entities - their motivations might not make that much sense.
Jon and Rhaegal, Daenerys and Drogo, Tyrion and Viserion.
The last one was hinted in one of the Tyrion sample chapters of AWOW, where after a game of cyvasse he picks up a white dragon figurine covered in blood (the colour of Lannisters). Thus we have 3 Targaryens for the 3 dragons.
They probably have to be relatively close to keep them bound but considering how fast wights move an actuial White walker should never be singled out. The one Jon dualed was a test/cock waving by the night king.
And unless they give evey footmen the Thoros treatment and ignite their swords(which is possible) they are going to get fuck by the waves of the dead.
The white walker would just extinguish the burning sword.
(see the burning building in Hardhome)
I just rewatched the Season Six trailer. Is Arya north of the wall? What the FUCK is she doing north of the wall? Anyone still North of the wall is damn near fucked.
Time to binge it all in preparations of the new season!
It should technically be snowing in Kings Landing at this point in the story, the North is pretty as inhospitable as North of the Wall during Winter.
You don't have to be buff or tall to be a bad ass fighter, Bonn proves this. Jon Snow even in the books was described as lean and quick, he originally had to strap longclaw on his back because he was to to short to keep it on his hip, at least until he grew taller. He was always shorter and less muscled compared to Robb its a part of their entire(and jon's unlikely hero) dynamic.
He's not nor was ever supposed to be your classical tall buff hero bad ass, that was Robb, and we all know how well that turned out.