I hate how in this day and age everybody wants to be a rebel. Heaven forbid you do what your boss asks.
The boss is entirely in the wrong here. I could see if she was wearing something "inappropriate" and she was front facing but even then.....if it has zero effect on her job function and she can do it then i see no reason to try and keep her from wearing whatever she pleases. Especially if it's a cultural thing. This is a slippery slope though and I feel like there always needs to be a middle ground with things like this.
Sounds like the boss is a bit of a dick. Frankly speaking though, if your boss says you can or can't wear something then you have to abide by the rules. You are expected to present yourself in a manner that the company desires, don't like it, find another employer.
The number of people in this thread that don't understand the difference between cultural/religious attire and "stuff you wear because you like it" is disappointing. A cowboy hat and a headscarf in this context are about as similar as apples and zebras.
Funny. Boss is a silly goose. Both sound like annoying and juvenile people. Also, what the fuck do the rights of women have to do with any of this? Kind of a mindless line to add to an otherwise entertaining story.
Both seems to have way to much free time on there hands ....
Hats are very different from headscarves... I just do not see them at all the same. A woman wearing a hat is very different from a woman in a scarf. Men just don't wear scarves though so the closest similarity would be a hat; however, hats aren't similar to scarves.
- - - Updated - - -
Or rebel and fight the stupidity while finding another employer.
Be amazed, not all of us are americans.
- - - Updated - - -
Sorry, I agree with him. She is acting like a child and deserves to lose her job.
- - - Updated - - -
You are right, cosplay is 100% legit office clothing, you should go like that too. Tell me how it went.
Yeah, we should be aware of, and tolerate people's prejudices/racism for the sake of making money.
I hate the world we live in...
- - - Updated - - -
And she should report him to the better business bureau for setting discriminatory guidelines.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
I'm fairly sure that all cultures have male headcoverings, including hats as well.
Your objections to the comparison really seem like they're not based on anything other than just declaring that they're not the same. Why, specifically, are they not the same? What do you feel the difference is between someone that wants to dress like Raylan in the picture above relative to Rivas's preferred attire? Like I said, I don't really know what to say to the claim that an employer banning hats would be totally fine, but that banning a headscarf is stupid. Maybe you've just kind of staked out a silly position and don't want to move off of it.
- - - Updated - - -
HR would strongly advise never really telling anyone anything about why you didn't hire them. There's no upside for an employer to say much of anything other than, "we decided to go another direction".
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/02/u...itch-case.html
- - - Updated - - -Justice Scalia, writing for seven justices, said Ms. Elauf did not have to make a specific request for a religious accommodation to obtain relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits religious discrimination in hiring.
Samantha Elauf. Credit Jim Bourg/Reuters
“Title VII forbids adverse employment decisions made with a forbidden motive,” Justice Scalia said from the bench, “whether this motive derives from actual knowledge, a well-founded suspicion or merely a hunch.”
Justice Scalia elaborated on this point in his written opinion. “An employer may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions,” he wrote.
Groups that represent religious minorities, including Muslims, Sikhs and Jews, applauded the ruling. They said it would help protect their members against employment discrimination based on their members’ religious attire, head coverings or beards.
“The decision by the Supreme Court today affirmed the basic right to practice one’s faith freely without fear of being denied the opportunity to pursue the American dream,” said Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney of the Sikh Coalition, a national advocacy group.
The case started in 2008 when Ms. Elauf, then 17, applied for a job in a children’s clothing store owned by Abercrombie & Fitch at Woodland Hills Mall in Tulsa, Okla. She wore a black head scarf but did not say why.
The company declined to hire her, saying her scarf clashed with the company’s “Look Policy,” or dress code. After the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued on Ms. Elauf’s behalf, the company said it had no reason to know that Ms. Elauf’s head scarf was required by her faith.
Which is the best course of action if you do not want your employees to wear such things. You just keep it to yourself.
The above article outlines that if you speak up about why that person cannot be employed, you're gonna have a bad time.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
they're both head coverings.. one is less broad and much tighter around the head than a hat.
Hats typically are worn when it is cold or to protect yourself from the sun.
Scarves are worn to either be modest about hair (in some cultures) or they're worn because you don't want to deal with doing up your hair. Typical male hair styles in the workplace are shorter and require much less maintenance.
Male head coverings pretty much are hats... and then a various number of religious head coverings... there really is no popular head covering that is worn for men in many cultures, outside of a hat. hats specifically are made for outdoor wear which is why "no hats inside" has become a kind of etiquette thing we have come to adopt.
Scarves are not used in the same manner at all.
Which I regard as an absolutely batshit state of affairs. It has a pretty obvious unintended consequence - applicants basically can't get any meaningful impact from employers about why they didn't get the job. They won't just tell you, "you wore a stupid hat, don't wear stupid hats", in no small part because the primary role of HR is making sure that hiring and firing don't result in lawsuits.
But it is what it is. I sure wouldn't be telling anyone why I didn't hire them.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.