The only issue is how many freedoms we want to take away. It's one thing to have an extremist view, an entirely different issue to act out on such views. It's dangerous to lump everyone under an entire religion together. If we do, then we also have to do the same for every group.
No, it isnt. How did you get that impression?
What a bullshit. Where do you read your news? At Breitbart?
Germany is a stable democracy with a stable economy. No matter if Trump wants to ban german steel.
We sell too many cars to america?
Build better ones.
*Sigh*
Since nobody is holding a gun to the head of any of the involved parties, BOTH sides are 'winning'. The side importing goods for currency is valuing the goods higher, the side exporting goods for currency is valuing the currency higher. Otherwise one side would not participate in the fucking trade in the first place.
In what sense is Germany "getting destroyed" or "falling apart"? Their crime levels are still on the low side for developed nations. The German economy is running strong; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-proves-robust. Germany's response to climate change is already way ahead of the USA's; they weren't going to be getting any money from the USA due to the Paris Agreement.
You have literally no idea what you're talking about.
Last edited by Endus; 2017-07-26 at 09:29 PM.
No, it just makes some claims about the nationality of the perpetrators, it doesn't actually say anything about their residence permit status. So it cannot be used to conclude that they weren't part of the mass immigration wave of 2015. (and you would have to come up with a good reason why the unfortunate developement in crime statistiscs after years of decline in crime started right after that wave)
And then I gave you three reasons why the debunking of the taz is statistically unsound. Which you chose to ignore for the second time in a row. I don't like to waste time, so if you ignore them again, I am gonna skip that topic.
Did you bring any arguments apart from "germanys economy is doing fine"? Because that is not quite an argument.
Weren't they included? Indeed probably not because no suspects were caught. Too bad.
Is left-wing activism also sourced in anger or is it more the fear side of arbitrary emotional assignations?
Ah the fallacy of composition. If one person runs toward the door in a movie theater fire and gets away, then clearly all people should run towards that single door at once on the case of a fie. The same applies to immigration. Just because a few immigrants came to the US and became successful, does not mean every single immigrant should come to the US because it would sink the system. That's not a bit racist, but it is a bit logical.
Last edited by nanook12; 2017-07-26 at 09:33 PM.
Not only Racist, but homophobe, misogynist pig and, last but not least, literally Hitler.
At least according to some.
Well, better than an average of 70, which our society will evolve to if we didnt take immigrants.
Do i hear some racist prejudice in your "sub saharan african"- role model invocation?
Quantify what?
- - - Updated - - -
They were included. They just didnt matter.
I dont know. Probably ask a left wing activist?
Last edited by mmoc903ad35b4b; 2017-07-26 at 09:39 PM.