No one fucking said Antifa wasn't there. They were there....all like fucking 10 of them. They were forcibly kept away from the main rally point by police due to the concern of it turning into a shooting situation if an Antifa flag was put in the face of the protesters at the main rally that was already heating up.
They spent most of their time away from the main point getting into fist fights with protesters that would group around local businesses like a coffee shop, throw piss on minorities exiting, scream to burn down the building, or try to force bystanders to join their rally.
Also, yeah counter protesters had weapons. They had fucking sticks of wood and bats because the situation was getting out of hand. Bystanders would be forced up against a wall by a guy in riot armor and told to join their rally or go into the oven. The protesters themselves arrived armed in riot gear, rifles, and bulletproof vests. Of course people started carrying shit.
Ahah. Five or six people with sticks = "the left arrived, deadset on violence!"
Busloads of Nazi's and KKK's, armed with shields, clubs, firearms and so on = "They were only protecting them because the Left would attack them"
Yeah, you are biased as fuck, and it's pretty clear WHO you support.
I have this thread bookmarked for that. Just about every person who frothes about muslims has been in there to defend the non-muslim terrorist, which by their agenda can't exist.
Not sure how it's so difficult to condemn all terrorists, but apparently for some it is.
OK, the thread just went from Nazi apologism to a transgender couple and dicks on faces. Talking about a galactic deflection.
"hate Speech" isn't a legal term, but the law is clear - speech expressing hateful feelings is protected.
~~ ACLU
1> No, it doesn't sound anything like gay conversion therapy. It was a snide comment to a transphobic guy, nothing more.
2> How the hell does that have anything to do with what we're discussing here?
3> Who the hell was "banned"? For what comments, exactly? And banned from what? Important details.
This is objectively being an apologist for a Nazi terrorist. Why, exactly, are you jumping in on that side of things?
1> The counter-protest started in response to the white supremacist protest, who showed up armed. Arming yourself in self defense makes perfect sense.
2> Aren't you usually on the side of the 2nd Amendment? These folks have a right to be armed. Hell, they could've been carrying firearms, legitimately.
3> Notice how they weren't using those weapons until a terrorist plowed into the crowd with his car, only using them [i]in defense of innocent people? And yet, here you are, complaining about it.
You're hyper inconsistent on stuff, dude.
Last edited by Endus; 2017-08-14 at 07:54 PM.
Correct. People started arming themselves or carrying bats, even when not part of the protests, because of the issues with the protesters around shopping locations and such not related to the rally.
Did some arm themselves to go to the rally itself to counter protest? Yeah. But it was mostly in response to seeing bus loads of people coming in armed and equipped for a riot. But there were a lot of even bystanders walking around with knives, bats, etc out because of harassment and assaults that were happening.
When I mentioned a minority getting piss thrown on them, that's from experience and not just the reports of it happening both from local news and a police scanner. A black guy leaving a coffee shop was confronted by 4 guys who threw piss on him and were screaming at him to go back to Africa. I watched a guy with riot armor pin a woman up against the wall and tell her to join them or she belongs in the oven. Vehicles at stop lights would have rocks and bricks thrown at them by people with Fuck Jews signs.
This been posted yet? Nazis hitting people with sticks.
I feel like the bolded should be related in some way, I just can't put my finger on it.
But that's not the only reason you're being called a nazi sympathizer:
The video was posted in the OP. You're drawing a false equivalence to disparage people who are against nazis. You're offering succor to nazis by harming their enemies on false pretexts. You may not have wanted to be on the side of nazis, but that's the side your indefensible statements defend.