Wow, they can't even stop a girl without killing her?
They got tasers and pepper spray. Also words.
Here's the thing, cops are very dangerous to citizens. I think that danger should be lessened by removing some of the tools cops use to harm people.
If only one innocent person is saved than disarming each and every cop is worth it.
How so? I think the state should not kill citizens. I oppose a police state.
No, I know it is dangerous. But that is known before they sign up.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe they can, maybe they can't. That's a risk I can live with.
You clearly don't have the common courtesy to respect the wishes of a dead kid or their parent's feelings, even if you disagree with the way they identify you could have at least chosen the correct pronouns. How very immature and tone deaf of you. Perhaps people like you rejecting they's self-identification is what led to they having a mental breakdown.
We have faced trials and danger, threats to our world and our way of life. And yet, we persevere. We are the Horde. We will not let anything break our spirits!"
And when citizens kill each other? The police should just stand aside and shout at them? You realize their procedures for neutralizing threats are to protect the public as much as protect themselves, right?
Fortunately, no one with any authority in our government agrees with you.
Here is the thing:
A criminal shooting a cop is tragic. But. It is less tragic than a cop shooting an innocent citizen.
Because the state doing something horrible is worse than criminals doing something horrible
Because we hold them to different moral standards.
Mythbusters were testing when one person was standing still and trying to shoot, while the other one was just running at him.
The dude in this story was not running, the police officer was not standing still. He could've just keeped the distance and was not in much danger.
A 3 minute youtube search.
A knife wielding guy tazed and cuffed without having to be killed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQT-5jmTEWY
Police in Ukraine using nothing but batons to stop the knife wielding drunk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkcAlext6yQ
Police in Russia using batons a shovel and a low kick to stop the knife wielding dude:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcgtdotvCNA
So there are other options aside from killing someone ye?
Worth considering something -- most police are only supposed to use non-lethals under the same conditions under which they would use their firearm; i.e. reasonably perceiving an imminent threat to the life or safety of themselves or another. If we parse their degree of threat, I think it's much more likely we'll see tasers and stun guns become an off-hand substitute for any patience or negotiation. Besides, non-lethal isn't a magic spell, people can and do get killed or seriously injured by those options as well, which is why the standard for use of force is (generally speaking) the same anyway, to avoid police being cavalier with use of force.
The range on pepper spray and a Tazer is FAR FAR shorter than that of a gun. Which means that not only are the cops defenseless themselves, but as they try to hide from a gun wielding nutjob, others of those citizens you so proudly want to protect will likely be gunned down. You are aware that police training doesn't remove the officers natural instict to protect their own lives right? They aren't going to try to get to 20 ft from a shooter just to use a Tazer (assuming you mean a Tazer though, with the projectile barbs, and not a taser in the generic sense of a stun gun with a range of basically 0 ft) while the gunman is firing at them. Just because they voluntarily signed up be a cop doesn't mean they signed over to forfeit their lives for nothing, right? And if those cops are killed trying to subdue, with a Tazer or pepper spray, guess who will be next? More of those citizens you want to protect.