When the glass splash from the window rains over the sleeping seven-year-old.
When her grandmother wakes up because she can not get air due to tear gas.
When families in a multi-family house hear how one of the neighbors' apartments is completely broken and broken.
When a young liberal and anti-fascist gets attacked on the open street because of his political views.
When a young moderate politician becomes threatened to life because of his commitment.
When a dad and his son are chased through the streets of a large group of men, then be slaughtered, kicked off, beaten by a chair that occupied.
Then it is extremely clear that a bunch of academics from Södertörn University and Gothenburg University in a debate article in Dagens Nyheter argues that the autonomous left, which all the people I previously claimed had fallen victim to, have an ideology that is characterized by demands for more democracy and better conditions for, for example, immigrants, women and HBTQ people.
And because their purposes, with enhanced rights and in-depth democracy (in their own interpretation) are good, they should not be seen as a potential extremist threat, according to the researchers behind the article.
Say it to someone who, for life, gets kicked down because of his political sympathies, or gets his house vandalized, or get an ax in the door!
At the very least there is a serious discussion that in the fight against market economy and anti-fascism, all means of excuse, even the naked violence, can be said to be shameful.
In a screwed argument, the violent enemy's nightly attacks, called "home visits", are referred to as "self-defense". It's easy to keep up with the policeman who, in Mission Review, declares that self-defense is something that should happen immediately after being attacked and that the concept falls legally and morally when the victims are sleeping grandmothers.
There are more serious overthrows - a number of senior representatives in an aspiring government party youth federation, that is, Young Left, has thus gone into a debate article and openly defended the violence activities of the Revolutionary Front and AFA.
There is no good, democratic or apologetic act of violence, as depicted in Wednesday's Mission Review.
Therefore, it is good that Jonas Sjöstedt and Young Left's press secretary, Tove Liljeholm, are unequivocal with their rejection.
DT welcomes the fact that leftist debaters and representatives in Dalarna, like Göran Greider and Leif Lindström, are unequivocal that violence is never an acceptable political method.