Everybody acting like Neo-Nazis just showed up yesterday. They have always been there, and we have always mocked them.
This was argued and countered hard the last time somebody brought that up.
to keep it simpel when people called Obama a nazi because he wanted healthcare reform it isn't morally the same as Trump defending nazi's as ''very fine people''.
When people called Obama a nazi it was based on pure hate calling trump a nazi was based on his own actions since he was defending literal nazi's.
Considering racist groups have been getting a bump since Trump announced he was running for president, yeah, you are wrong again.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/1...macists-216620
When the leader of the biggest racist website Stormfront, says that they have been getting a lot of traffic, that usually means that people are flocking to them because they are emboldened by Trump.
You are the only one saying that. And I don't call you a nazi for it.
I call those like you a nazi, when, much like the President, can't say the words "Nazis are bad"
- - - Updated - - -
"If you don't agree with me, that nazis are bad, you are not better than a nazi" is what he's saying.
Do you disagree?
The european hate speech laws are basicly one step away from being state-run opinion control, stigmatizing and punishing people who doesn't agree with the current majority of the government. Europe as a whole is slowly turning into China, with blocked internet and punishment for opinions, so its nothing to strive for
Nazis in Charlottesville? What are Antifags doing in Charlottesville?
Lmao what a red herring, like the "counter protesters" waving the hammer and sickle flag are sooooooooo much better
This is literally just a distraction from actual issues within our communities, and is an attempt to polarize literally everyone until you can place them into two groups, Nazis, or the "Enlightened". But lets not play ourselves, this is just a way to dehumanize an entire demographic of people to make it easier to purge them after the "communist revolution".
People? Or person? Are you going to put the blood of that one person and make the others guilty by association?
Everyone with a sense of justice and moral standing agreed the woman who was killed was reprehensible. However I always predicted we'd not genuinely take this seriously until someone died, regardless of what side the body was on. Political violence will only escalate. The marchers of Charlottesville were met with aggression and violence. Coming to blows, and it'd take a radical of the right fueled by the violent intents of both sides who enacted the murder.
I strictly believe that everything that happened there was influenced by the violence held there. Had Antifa or any groups not been driven to attack one another, the woman could've still been alive. We often talk that groups are not responsible for the individuals' actions. But then want to blame this horrid nazi group (which believe me, many sane people find their entire group disgusting and abhorrent) for the murder. You either blame the whole group, or the individual who took it too far.
You either blame all of Antifa for tolerating and supporting political violence, or the individuals who brazenly attack others who further inspire them to harm others.
[Insert Infraction Here]