There are certainly some physical activities where man perform better, but there is far too much pushing of the idea that men are outright superior at everything and that physical activities should exclude women.
How many times I wonder are the "measures" for physical jobs actually measuring what is needed vs how many times they are simply aimed at a subset of men.
Yes, because opening your mouth about an open secret over someone who has had literal video evidence of him sexual harassing someone and still has not been tried for his crimes because of his power and influence of not only the industry, but the career of every working person you've probably met with in Hollywood is a real smart idea that benefits your career so much.
This would be akin to President Donald J Trump colluding with Russia and the country expecting his cabinet to whistle blow on him and put their careers on the line because that's what's good for the country.
Honestly I'm usually not so selfish around these claims, but of course when you get the con-servatives out they of course gotta bring down the hypocrisy.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
Last edited by Seidhe; 2017-10-16 at 04:05 PM.
Coercion could be something like:
Employer: Do you want this job?
Applicant: Yes.
Employer: Will you have sex with me for the job?
Applicant: No.
Employer: Will you reconsider if I make some calls to other studios to soil your reputation?
Applicant: I guess I don't have much of a choice.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
The image that women are acting entitled is only being summoned by the religious and the zealous that only see a womans place in the kitchen. Yes, women today are entitled compared to women in 1920 who had to fight tooth and nail to vote.
Let's just not forget it wasn't women who decided they couldn't vote. And it's not women who decide what you view them as because of some femimorons.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
Prostitution = sex for money.
What the actors dealt with = sex or you do not get to work.
No, they are not the same.
It's been going on since the dawn of the industry. There's a reason "casting couch" has been a synonym for it since the fucking 1940s.
People acting shocked and appalled by it now, as if it is some new revelation that no one had ever conceived of before, is what's really sad about the whole thing.
typical sjw femo insane titan answer.
correct will be:
Employer: Do you want this job?
Applicant: Yes.
Employer: Will you have sex with me for the job?
Applicant: No.
Employer: No job then
Applicant: Then i would do sex.
You should understand difference. Your example i would call bad example. I would say i woudl agree with you in that case.
I think Europe is concerned about sexual harassment behavior a lot more than the US. Europe tends to legislate everything even how we approach each other to start a relationship. The US is more libertarian where the government allows us to work out our own issues.
Weinstein was wrong because he was in an economic position of power over these women. The jobs the women were trying out for were really rare acting jobs that could potentially make these women millions of dollars.
Some stranger sitting across the aisle from you on a buss who is attempting to make conversation is not in the same league as Weinstein.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
I am having a hard time wrapping my head around your logic - or lack thereof. So if an applicant is told they must have sex with the employer to get the job - they should have sex, get the job, and everything is fine? You really do not see how this is a horrible practice?
You can think this is okay. I can think you're wrong.