Thread: Why mongoose?

Page 1 of 2
1
2
LastLast
  1. #1

    Why mongoose?

    Why do so many warrior tanks use mongoose on high end weapons rather than bladeward?

  2. #2
    Scarab Lord Frumpy Frumpy Frak's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Malben, 'Strailya
    Posts
    4,458

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Blade ward's uptime is dismal compared to Mongoose.
    Garrosh did nothing wrong.
    #MakeTheHordeGreatAgain

  3. #3
    Bloodsail Admiral phyrix's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    In ur cupboardz steelin ur cookies
    Posts
    1,248

    Re: Why mongoose?

    The haste provides extra threat, the agility provides extra armor and avoidance.

    It's by no means a bad enchant.

    That being said, it's not the best one either.

  4. #4

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Not to mention the proc on blade ward is subject to much harsher DR.

  5. #5

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Cause it's better ??

    120agi = armor+dogde and armor is like ten best stat ever

    And ye I know it's proc , but still Moongose uptime is higher then Blade Ward one

  6. #6

    Re: Why mongoose?

    a bit of armor/dodge/crit and faster weapon=more heroic strike.

    TBH i think there really isnt a 'BEST' tanking weapon as of now for warriors. (Its a matter of preference... I like mongoose tho )

    they really should have added Titanguard or w/e that increased stamina :P


  7. #7

    Re: Why mongoose?

    thanks guys
    and what DR?

  8. #8

    Re: Why mongoose?

    i hear BD is quite nice for DW tank specs(which almost everyone is using nowadays)
    PlayStation suporter.
    fb_Scud / RPG-HAD

  9. #9

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by smartAXE
    i hear BD is quite nice for DW tank specs(which almost everyone is using nowadays)
    DW for warrior tanks?
    I am the co-host of a WoW related podcast at www.warcraftlounge.com. Check it out for tips on making gold, commentary on general WoW news, and entertaining recaps of the stupid shit that has happened to us in game. You can download us at iTunes, where we have a 5 star rating from our listeners.

  10. #10

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by Strykee
    thanks guys
    and what DR?
    Parry has a more punishing diminishing returns than dodge/agi.
    Also with blade ward, once you parry it's gone. Mongoose keeps on going regardless if you dodge or not.

    Also, with DW he prolly means deep wounds, not dual wield :P
    Then again, I see the DW spec benefiting more from mongoose than bladeward in all honesty :\

  11. #11

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by MestHoop
    Parry has a more punishing diminishing returns than dodge/agi.
    Also with blade ward, once you parry it's gone. Mongoose keeps on going regardless if you dodge or not.

    Also, with DW he prolly means deep wounds, not dual wield :P
    Then again, I see the DW spec benefiting more from mongoose than bladeward in all honesty :\
    BD=blood draining he probably means
    Noodles and Coke, diet of the raider. Found what he was after, after nearly 3months.

  12. #12

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by MestHoop

    Then again, I see the DW spec benefiting more from mongoose than bladeward in all honesty :\
    meh its what i heard, i've been fury since kara and only go prot for pvp :L
    and yes i ment draining
    PlayStation suporter.
    fb_Scud / RPG-HAD

  13. #13

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Besides the obvious advantages mongoose has over the parry rating (Agi is probably one of the best stats for warriors, not gonna go into why.) and the obvious uptime difference( 45 % ~ vs 20 % ~) the one big reason for me to chose mongoose over bladeward is the fact that the damageproc from bladeward is a physical attack and can therefore be parried.

    Parry haste ftl


    You should also know that bladeward is NOT a DPS or THREAT increase over mongoose.

  14. #14
    Mechagnome
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    580

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldozor
    Besides the obvious advantages mongoose has over the parry rating (Agi is probably one of the best stats for warriors, not gonna go into why.) and the obvious uptime difference( 45 % ~ vs 20 % ~) the one big reason for me to chose mongoose over bladeward is the fact that the damageproc from bladeward is a physical attack and can therefore be parried.

    Parry haste ftl


    You should also know that bladeward is NOT a DPS or THREAT increase over mongoose.
    Only two of the twelve ICC bosses have parry haste enabled, and their melee damage isn't a major factor when fighting them. Any boss that would cause problems if they parry hasted doesn't have parry hasting enabled, so why is it a concern?

  15. #15
    Deleted

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by phyrix
    The haste provides extra threat, the agility provides extra armor and avoidance.

    It's by no means a bad enchant.

    That being said, it's not the best one either.
    Haste provides extra parryhaste, you mean? Threat comes from instant swings, not next-swing casts, other than heroic strike.

  16. #16

    Re: Why mongoose?

    In my experience, Bladeward just isn't worth the mats. Possibly a weak answer, considering how easy mats are to come by, but it's just lackluster in every way that matters to me as a tank. Mongoose is more 'fun'.

    I might go with blood drinking as a tanking enchant in the future, if I ever decide to tank ICC, but BW just fails to impress.
    Quote Originally Posted by Separate
    Maybe I can see if Exodus or Paragon have a strat on how to make girls clothes just fall off, exploiting of course.
    Quote Originally Posted by wulfen13
    There are exploits for that, but you get a long time in prison for them...

  17. #17

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardolan
    Only two of the twelve ICC bosses have parry haste enabled, and their melee damage isn't a major factor when fighting them. Any boss that would cause problems if they parry hasted doesn't have parry hasting enabled, so why is it a concern?
    Man, on heroic sindy I'd like to reduce the incoming burst as much as I can

  18. #18
    Deleted

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by MestHoop
    Man, on heroic sindy I'd like to reduce the incoming burst as much as I can
    those 2 bosses are lady DW and the shadow lance spamming blood prince so parry hsate isnt realy something you should even consider as dangerous in icc

  19. #19

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by maaghen
    those 2 bosses are lady DW and the shadow lance spamming blood prince so parry hsate isnt realy something you should even consider as dangerous in icc
    ˆNo, only Deathwhisper and Sindragosa.
    Source : http://avengingwrathy.wordpress.com/...o-parry-haste/

    OT : I use Mangoose since Ulduar. It's a good enchant, interesting in most raid encounters, it's only unefficient in heavy magic-damages fights. Otherwise it's straight Armor (not a huge amount), Dodge, so that's 2 tanking stats here, and also Crit + Haste, so 2 aggro stats here. It's simply good, it's not as clumsly as Blade Ward or Blood Draining, it's a reliable enchant.
    http://eu.wowarmory.com/character-sh...n&cn=Alianthos

  20. #20

    Re: Why mongoose?

    Quote Originally Posted by BLSTMASTER
    a bit of armor/dodge/crit and faster weapon=more heroic strike.

    TBH i think there really isnt a 'BEST' tanking weapon as of now for warriors. (Its a matter of preference... I like mongoose tho )

    they really should have added Titanguard or w/e that increased stamina :P

    it was removed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •