Originally Posted by
Cavolo
I don't think many of the Alliance players have actually gone through the Horde questline in South Barrens that deals directly with the Razing of Taurajo. I haven't played through the Alliance end of it, so I don't know the motivations or who ordered what, but their are a number of facts that are revealed in the Horde quests:
1) The Alliance who participated in the take, irregardless of who ordered what, were killing anything that moved, including women and children. This is what caused so scant few refugees by the Taurens reckoning to make it. One Tauren women mentioned that by mere luck she made it through the Alliance lines and if she hadn't she would have been killed by Alliance soldiers (she's in Camp Una'fe) along with a child. The father of said child is in the fortified Horde camp just north of the ruins of Taurajo, who tells you that his wife never made it out.
I don't know if there were actually orders for the town civilians to be allowed to retreat, but if their were, they weren't carried out. Ultimately, then if falls on the head of the General leading the forces and also the sovereign who sent them there. That, since these guys are Theramore soldiers, would be Jaina Proudmoore, who shares responsibility even if she wasn't the author of that particular atrocity. I imagine Thrall is going to have some very harsh words for her once this mess gets straightened out, particularly since Theramore was only allowed to exist after the Third War because of Jaina's promise to Thrall that the town wouldn't be used against the Horde.
2) The Alliance attacked Taurajo when most of the braves in the town were out hunting, or that is what you are told by either the ghosts of one of the fallen or a survivor (I forget which). The reason you have a disproportionate amount of Tauren warriors around there is because the Alliance timed their attack on Taurajo when it has as poorly defended as possible, which given it wasn't a fortified town but a savannah trading post, means there weren't much more than civilians present when the Alliance hit it. The Alliance did kill unarmed people there, for certain. When you talk to the ghost of the Leatherworker trainer there, he tells you that he was forced to defend himself against Alliance soldiers with one of his skinning knives, because he had nothing else to fight back with when they stormed the town. Certainly the Horde sees what they did as absurdly dishonorable, must more so than if the Alliance had met the Tauren in direct battle and won. This is why one of the last Horde quests you do down there is killing and stringing up the corpse of the Alliance general who ordered the attack, not because he attacked them (Horde members can understand that) but because his men butchered innocent civilians while their men were away.
Further, we know that Taurajo was undefended because of the Hordes own reaction to it. Bloodhilt, the orc who found himself in charge of the Tauren warriors who survived Taurajo, goes to Desolation Hold where the Horde command in the region is, specifically because it was the job of Desolation Hold to send forces to defend Taurajo if it came under attack and the Warlord Gar'dul failed to do so. Bloodhilt, ah, takes umbridge with his reasoning, to say the least and invokes the "Victory or Be Chucked Out a Window By Someone Who Takes the War Seriously" clause in his contract.
My own opinion?
The Alliance had a legitimate reason to attack Taurajo from their perspective, certainly. They don't know anything about the Tauren. The Tauren are eight foot tall super strong minotaurs who are skilled warriors and they've probably observed the Tauren, who hunt the equivalent of Elephants with bows and spears. That's pretty damn intimidating. They also clearly don't see them as "people". I know Alliance players occasionally like to Disney up the Alliance in terms of honor and nobility, but the fact is that the humans in the Alliance are culturally somewhat similar to medieval Earth humans, in that "chivalry" and "honor" and "a fair fight" only applies to other guys like you, not to guys from other cultures and certainly not to hunter-gatherer savages who are allied with the people you've got serious beef with. Remember, Theramore, in recent memory was conquered by the Horde, which include Tauren forces which may well have marched through Taurajo on their way to Theramore. With a wound like that and given that you do "chivalry" with dirty wogs like the Tauren, is anyone shocked that Alliance soldiers tried to kill every Tauren they found at Taurajo when they got the go ahead to do so? And remove a possible Horde military training center in the deal to make way for Alliance settlement? Makes bloody sense to me. The fact that they were wrong about the nature of Taurajo and that now the survivors of the massacre are going to make the Alliance pay in blood for their women and children who were dishonorably cut down (and do, if you take the Horde quest lines as true), well, the Alliance involved will get what they deserve at the end.
Taurajo didn't have anything to do with Southshore, or the Forsaken (I'd argue that the Forsaken had a more than legitimate excuse to raze Southshore, given that was the Alliance's port in the region). It was a stupid senseless tragedy that happens in war, and I guarantee you there will be alot more Taurajos and Southshores in the future.