For all the sweeping assumptions and generalizations you've managed to make in your scant few posts, you still don't seem to be able to read or at the least comprehend the information given to you. Anonymous' goal is not a violent coup d'etat of the international government. They're not going to "war" with NATO, they're simply making adverse threats to their capabilities to keep people as blindly ignorant to the goings on as your common American citizen and actively attacking foreign governments who take extreme measures to keep their people in the dark. Anonymous can claim at least partial responsibility for the aid in liberty and revolution in a number of MENA states whereas you can only claim full responsibility for attempting to undermine a hacktivist collective that has demonstrated its ability to destroy a counter-hacker working in tandem with a multi-billion dollar corporation who surely could afford to buy the "best" counter hacker in the world. You fight against those that attempt to allow you to exercise the rights you were meant to have, those that try to keep your government by you and, more importantly, for you. Fighting against your own interests is fine; it's your right to be ignorant, but to criticize the amorphous entity that stands against the corruption and lies fed to you by spoon and force-fed to those of other countries is abominable and I don't envy your condition or respect the views you've been made to believe.