"It's just like I always said! You can do battle with strength, you can do battle with wits, but no weapon can beat a great pair of tits!"
You know, I sort of guessed that you were going to say something like this but I didn't write it yesterday because I wanted to keep an open mind.
But you are, essentially, conflating islamic terrorists with muslims in general. That's you're problem, not the the problem of the people who are "excusing" islamic terrorists. Because, and get this, islamic terrorists are all muslims but not all muslims are islamic terrorists.
What people who cheer on ''vigilante justice'' always fail to realize that such awesome concept might be applied to them....
In fact, as a nation that provided millions upon millions of immigrants to the Americas, the Italians should be well aware of this. There was incidents seriously bordering on pogroms during the 19th century. At least a sixth of people lynched by the KKK until the 1960S were Southern Europeans like Italians-in the little charts racists were quite fond off, ''Latins'' were maybe above ''Africans'' but quite below WASPs...
This has to be sarcams this forum is definitely not a right wing forum. Every and Any person making even a claim that could be considered a right one is banned every 2 days while the whole "Anti-Trump" brigade can say whatever childish bullshit they want 24/7. They even got their own sub forum as it just got to annoying to read.
We also have Sarah whos the weirdest lefty on here attacking everyone with a different opinion while hardly ever been banned.
Then ofcourse Tennis who is Trudeau's forum account (who secretly hates people).
We have 2 Antifi members (alba and his friend) who constantly talk about killing everyone with a different opinion . but never get banned.
So please tell me its sarcasm.
Your definition of "right wing" must be "cannot help and discuss moderation", which is what gets people banned.
You are practically asking for it yourself, too.
It has nothing to do with being right wing.
- - - Updated - - -
To rate how civilized a society is by their human rights record.
What else would one use as metric?
This is my whole point, most ppl would condem the whole second groupe but not the first.
And it´s so hypocritical, and it was probably @Venants point to.
- - - Updated - - -
That is the kicker, most people will blame the enitre ring-wing belife system.
That is the point im trying to make.
- - - Updated - - -
No i ain´t. Im trying to make a point, maybe i just suck at making points.
That same logic aplies to ringt-wing alt right to?
People say one thing about, a type of terrorist, then make a 360 on another type.
Bourgeoisie intensifies.
People typically don't use any metric at all. Mostly because they understand that labeling stuff as civilized or uncivilized is just eurocentric rhetoric, with a historic tinge of white supremacy.
What were the European kingdoms doing in the Americas a few centuries ago? Civilizing those savages, of course.
It's no different than labeling certain cultural expressions as "degenerate": just a tool of powerful to sustain the status quo.
It's OK to support this or that human right with an argument. What's going on here is just hollow grandstanding.