If we are talking american politics of "right vs left", they are most definitely right-wing based on a few reasons.
Core ideology hinges on the right of women to choose what they do with their life is an affront to their existence. This puts them in line with the right via abortion rights and birth control rights. This also comes with a general agreement that "times were better in the past" when women did not work and relied on men, and you tick another "conservative" check box. Be it an outdated one that most conservatives don't even agree with these days, it is still a subsect of the conservative movement that believes this crap. Then add in a huge reliance on being "anti-feminist" in the sense they delve into right wing talking points regarding feminism such as "feminism is a movement to destroy masculinity" and you get a nice mixture of right wing talking points from various groups. You also get a mixture of the "immigration is destroying western culture" that appears from time to time in their groups and a "damn liburals are destroying the west" type ideas sprinkled in.
Basically the entire movement eats up right wing talking points because they are easily used to feed their self hate as well as their hatred for women. That isn't to say these right wing talking points are inherently doing that, but that is how the incel community tends to justify their hatred for women, through the lens of right wing shit.
If you are particularly bold, you could use a Shiny Ditto. Do keep in mind though, this will infuriate your opponents due to Ditto's beauty. Please do not use Shiny Ditto. You have been warned.
I didn't really know much about them until the Eliot Rodgers shooting and the "incel" thing started going a bit more public, so I read into it, and on the outside they just seem like the "Nice Guys" but instead of only expressing their hatred towards women, there is a mixture of self hatred as well. What I saw as I read through it all was a heavy mixture of stuff you would see on places such as brietbart, t_d, or fox news about topics that overlap. I'm sure some left minded people are part of the group as it probably absorbed the "nice guys" people, and that tends to just be apolitical really, but if they have completely drank the koolaid, they likely have moved far more right without even thinking truly thinking about it.
I can just tell you're trying to push him away because he doesn't fit your view. Sorry but your bible is bullshit and saying "but but bible said look out for" doesn't hold water.
If they say they're christian, go to church. This whole vegan thing is bullshit and you're just being a retard saying it.
Seriously. Also, the person that shot up the synagogue was a far leftist and made numerous posts about how he hated Trump for helping Israel. Far lefties have committed way more violence than the right. Ferguson, Bmore. All the most violent cities are run by Dems. The thing is MSM wont report the shit, so if thats all you watch, which clearly is what the OP is doing, then youre going to have warped sense of whats really happening.
You can walk around talking about how much you love Hilary, but wear a MAGA hat and you take a chance of getting beat up crazy leftists.
Don't be disingenuous. The dude was repeating actual far right, all the way to the fringe, talking points about conspiracies regarding "jews" controlling everyone, including democrats and republicans alike and Hitler level hatred of Jews. You calling him a "far leftists" is no better than people trying to blame that one on Trump.
That's a far-right talking point. Anti-semitism is largely a right-wing thing, pretty much by definition. His other views were all radically right-wing, too. Where the balls did you get the misbegotten delusion that he was left-wing in any way?
Absolute bullshit. You have no idea what you're talking about; you are wrong on the facts on this.Far lefties have committed way more violence than the right.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/683984.pdf
https://bsos.umd.edu/featured-conten...rorist-attacks
Any reasonable analysis puts left-wing violence at near-zero in the last two decades, while right-wing violent extremism is the largest single threat vector in terms of extremist violence. And not by a narrow margin.
Are you seriously citing angry protests and general criminality on the political leanings of mayors? And you expect to be taken seriously?Ferguson, Bmore. All the most violent cities are run by Dems. The thing is MSM wont report the shit, so if thats all you watch, which clearly is what the OP is doing, then youre going to have warped sense of whats really happening.
Big cities have issues with poverty and density, and the combination of the two leads to crime. That's about it. Most cities tend to lean more Democratic than surrounding rural areas. There is no ideological connection to be had, here.
People need to argue about things is the tldr of why it is even discussed, with a slight mixture of people trying to blame an "entire side" for x/y/z. I mostly just care about where talking points/ideas come from. The only idea that really came from the normal "right" with that dude is the hysteria over the caravan, but it wasn't a main motivating factor behind the guy.
I kind of view "finding the side crazies fall on" in more of "what you say is not said in a vacuum" type deal. Such as with the guy who sent bombs to people Trump constantly labeled the enemy of the people, or when Bill O'Reilys talking points were regurgitated almost verbatim by a man that murdered an abortion doctor. Watch your words when you have a microphone or else this kind of stuff escalates, and people who are fans of those people need to hold them accountable.
You might notice that this basically only comes up because right-wingers are desperately trying to twist the facts and blame political violence, dishonestly, on their opponents, and only their opponents.
Posts like mine, here, pointing out the prevalence of right-wing extremist violence pretty much only get made in response, to point at the actual facts, and correct that disinformation.
No, the goal isn't to try and tar all right-wingers as extremists. It's to get them to acknowledge the facts of radicalization in the USA, rather than making up fake propaganda as political slander.