It still amazes me people still engage in discussions with Mall Security (or whatever the fuck he calls himself nowadays), Machismo, or sarahtasher...
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah sure, the news networks didn't send the threats themselves, they just spread the lies that lead to those death threats. If they had done their actual jobs and reported the facts, instead of fabricating the articles by cutting the parts of the video that not only didn't match their narrative, but serve to disprove it, they wouldn't be in this situation now. Neither them or the kids in the video.
Last edited by Skorpionss; 2019-03-11 at 12:49 AM.
Did CNN / Washington Post cut the original video? No. They were working with the information they had at the time. Which is why they issue corrections and updates later. And even apologies. It happens.
Now if only we could get Faux News to stop fronting conspiracy theory bullshit that would be nice. Have they ever issued corrections?
These lawsuits are making the kid look bad.
*sues WaPo and CNN*
Nothing racist or bigoted going on here!
Yeah, right mate.
I actually had some sympathy for the kid until he started this nonsense.
Here is something to believe in!
The only way I see this kid ever getting any money is if any of these cases somehow get past dismissal (unlikely), and billing hours are high enough for CNN or WaPo to just make the kid go away and save money.
Let me ask you a question that you'll ignore. Government is 100% involved. No private party could initiate an action or expect a result without the government allowing it.
I get that your point is that it wouldn't happen unless a private citizen initiated the action, but the private citizen couldn't do initiate it - couldn't even contemplate it - unless the government had already laid down the framework for the suit. I know you're going to say that is your point - the government is the tool the private citizen uses, therefore it can't happen without the private citizen initiating it. The tool analogy.
But the analogy is too simple for this discussion. We're talking about mechanisms for restricting speech. Only the government can do that, period. Therefore, any action that restricts speech - either private or public - has to come from the government, 100% of the time. Whether they are the ones initiating the individual suit or just the process by which a private citizen does the same, without the government creating the laws, passing the laws, ruling on the laws, and ultimately enforcing the laws, the suit wouldn't exist.
Therefore it's the government ultimate action is restricting speech.
- - - Updated - - -
Exactly. And Precisely. WaPo didn't do a good job and owned up to it, but they didn't break any laws and they reported on what they had at the time.
- - - Updated - - -
Where the hell did you learn english so well? (not joking)
Last edited by cubby; 2019-03-11 at 01:48 AM.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Last edited by Masark; 2019-03-11 at 01:52 AM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
All you armchair lawyers and legal experts should do some research first before regurgitating all these talking points you got from the leftist media.
The lawyer representing the kids is an expert in libel and is rather well known. He's already gone after CBS and got a settlement out of them (google is your friend). No high powered attorney is going to take on a case like this contingent on winning/getting a favorable settlement unless they knew they had pretty damn good odds of doing so. Use your heads.
Your kind and kin considers that a fat turd screaming that there are sex tunnels below pizzeria as not suable. Your kind and kin routinely send death threats to actresses because they are in movies your owners ordered you to hate. Your kind and kin only conception of LIBEL is ''SOMETHING I'M TOLD TO NOT LIKE BY MY HANDLER'' : you kind and kin is mentally incapable to consider that saying Trump policies sucks is not ''A LIE'' but screaming that ''OBUMER KENYSAN MOSLEM'' is a lie
No, they shouldn't have been there in the first place. It was a school sanctioned event, from a tax exempt school since it was catholic, to protest for a political event, something the school, being a religious organization with tax exempt status that gets federal dollars, shouldn't be able to do. Just like a church can't inject itself in political things and keep their tax exempt status.
It is amazing, there are 25+ pages in here arguing about how frivolous this case is... But in reality it's pretty much textbook Defamation.
It checks all the legal requirements easily, it even checks the box for Libel against a Public Figure, if the defendants wanted to make that their argument (foolishly as it sounds.)
But, I already proved you to be objectively wrong, ignoring me won't change that simple fact. I even provided your own quotes that showed you arguing against your own words.
You got your ass handed to you, deal with it.
- - - Updated - - -
You whine about people being armchair lawyers... then proceed to do the exact same thing.
I love the irony, thanks for the laugh.