Lor'themar should be that guy. He just needs to do be involved a bit more. He's a certainly capable leader.
Lor'themar should be that guy. He just needs to do be involved a bit more. He's a certainly capable leader.
Also in Vashj'ir (Zone and Raid) quite a bit, in the stormwind city breakout, in the calia lore bit in storm song that horde get to watch, and she also takes over the main enemy force of the Horde this expansion... probably other bits I forgot as well
Also you can watch the war bringers in game.
- - - Updated - - -
As Alliance you literally see Talanji twice, once when you are told (And shown) they escaped the Alliance fleet, and the second time after you kill her father in the raid...
Shockingly Horde characters appear more in the Horde story then Alliance characters... this is new? over all though Jaina has had a much bigger impact on the overall story with which you interact with then most of them....
To be more specific, yes you will see Nathanos more then jaina as A Horde, but as far as crossover characters go she is one of the most common appearing characters in the game. Ergo. it's easy to say you see Jaina a lot which seems to be the point you are trying to contest.
Last edited by Whitedragon; 2019-12-27 at 05:19 AM.
I want to see Falstad get the spotlight for a while as an MC
The point you seem to be trying to make is she doesn't appear with much frequency as a Horde player, when in fact she shows up all over the place, much more so then meany enemies of the Horde in the past. To be more specific, yes you will see Nathanos more then jaina as A Horde, but as far as crossover characters go she is one of the most common appearing examples in the game. Ergo. it's easy to say you see Jaina a lot which seems to be the point you are trying to contest.
The point is clear, which if you'd read the exchange from the beginning you would have seen:
Why would someone happen to forget Jaina when discussing strong characters (in which said individual listed mainly horde characters)? The answer could be because as a horde player you have extremely few and limited interactions with Jaina. You in no way encounter Jaina "a lot" as a horde character, you see her a handful of times (certainly no more than 5) and she is mentioned briefly a couple of other times.
If you now want to add further qualifiers such as "most common crossover character" that's fair, I suppose, but not what I was originally talking about.
Fair enough, all though the 5 number is a low ball (as the lists I and others have given pointed out), I would also add, that at that point it's the players fault for ostracizing themselves from half the story.
I guess the simple solution is play both sides if you don't want to look ignorant/misinformed to others who do. *Shrug*
It's not a low ball figure at all, most of the stuff you listed the horde doesn't see - but feel free to list all the time Jaina appears horde side in BfA if you like. The Jaina warbringer is most certainly not prompted for horde players, unlike the Sylvannas one which is prompted twice.
Mate, what are you talking about? No one here looked ignorant or misinformed. Someone wonder why another individual happened to have left out Jaina, one of the potential reasons is because she's not featured heavily from the horde perspective in comparison to other characters.
In any case, only playing through one side isn't 'ostracising' oneself. All the key beats are covered on both sides, and many (if not most) players don't like grinding out every quest. It might come as a shock to you but people play for more than just the story.
Your responses are as if you've deliberately come looking for a fight, chill out.
What a politicized post. Your vantage point is talkin about "Mary Sue's" "PC" Gender and "blizzard embracing diversity".
Maybe you would find Jordan Petersen fitting?
- - - Updated - - -
Also Genn Greymane fits a likeable strong male lead
This thread has wandered a bit too far afield into identity politics and gender issues. Closing this.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead