Two insane finales in a row. I love this show. I hope for more action in season 3 though.
Yeah that's correct, it has nothing to do with some minimalistic message or "real people" or shitting on big action scenes. It's just recreating a specific scene from the comics with a slight wink at the cringy "empowerment" scene from endgame. They'll do spectacle whenever they feel like it, and have done so in the past.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah I made the same point earlier, but somehow people can't seem to separate "I don't find this kind of beatdown empowering" from "this shouldn't have happened the way it did" or seeing a minor point of criticism as some major attack on the series style. While I don't really agree with you that their attacks weren't doing anything, I think its pretty normal to not feel especially good about three people kicking into someone in the fetal position.
Last edited by Warning; 2020-10-17 at 11:14 AM.
It is possible she can vary the intensity, however that then begs the question "why not go full blast on the boys?". I did think when she blasted them "why aren't they in bits?" then "phew!". Maybe she wanted to use her hands on them, I dunno, but yea, it is an inconsistency.
MMO-Champ the place where calling out trolls get you into more trouble than trolling.
Yeah this is something that happens a lot in series and I really dislike it. Similarly when a new big bad is randomly introduced that is much stronger than the previous one. I hope they don't go down that route with "The Boys". I kind of genuinely would like to see how the world deals with an evil superman that has no equal. I also think Antony Starr's acting is phenomenal. So (without having read the comics) I hope we get just that, the threat to remain as it has been painted thus far, with no cheap outs or changing those parameters for the sake of the plot.
I'm pretty sure that Ryan was the "contingency" they had planned. Or at least, the first one, the one they'd use to control Homelander (they may have a second, in a more "final" sense, hell, they may have a way to de-power people with a Compound V counter-agent, hypothetically.)
Vought wouldn't have been keeping Ryan and Becca on a Vought compound out of the goodness of their hearts. It wasn't about protecting the two of them, it was about retaining their contingency plan in-house and under control.
The impression I got was that there's a weird telekinetic component to Stormfront's electricity. She can grab and throw things with it, and does so constantly. I suspect when she was destroying the building in that early scene, before killing the Female's brother on the roof, that was less her electricity blowing everything up through straight energy, and more her using that telekinetic component to rip things apart and throw them at other things. There's fire in one floor, but that could be a broken gas main igniting, not Stormfront's powers.
If you pay attention, she doesn't actually burn things with her powers much, it's more throwing things around. If it WERE straight electricity, Starlight would be her natural kryptonite; Starlight's powers are literally electricity absorption and then emitting that energy in light blasts. All Stormfront's powers would do to Starlight, if they were just electricity, is power her up. It'd be like shooting a concentrated sunlight energy blast at Superman.
I think the contingency idea is true...but I also believe it was supposed to be something of an experiment as well...to see what kind of superhuman they get when raised in a more nurturing environment than what Homelander got, but still under observation. They certainly seemed fine with keeping a hands off approach and letting Becca raise him how she liked rather than trying to push him into developing his powers so that he could be a direct counter to Homelander. Wouldn't surprise me at all to learn they have similar setups for other children all over the world.
Ryan is a potential contingency and also a future profit making endeavour. Vought would've had something previously planned whether it was useful or not. One thing they don't play up enough in the TV show is that Vought isn't particularly competent at what they do. Their continued existence relies almost solely on luck, lobbying and marketing.
Maybe not. Superman's power derives from absorbing specific wavelengths of energy. Stormfront's energy output may not be useful energy for Starlight. It would be like the opposite of Havoc and Cyclops. Both absorb specific sources of energy (including each others) but there's a lot they can't absorb.
Right, but what Starlight absorbs is, explicitly and clearly demonstrated, electricity. That's why she's stuck in that cell until the emergency lights turn on and give her enough of a power draw to charge herself up.
There might be limits to how much she can absorb, but that would need to be established, and it wasn't. And there's really no reason to think that Stormfront's powers wouldn't be absorbable, if they were electricity. But they don't really function like electricity; they move things telekinetically more than they burn and electrocute. The supposed "blast" from electric bursts is mostly your muscles spasming and launching you; that's NOT what we see with Stormfront. It's also purple, which electricity isn't.
That's the point. It doesn't act like electricity, it doesn't look right for electricity, Starlight can't channel it like she does electricity. So maybe it's just not electricity in any real, functional sense. Just looks enough like it for "Stormfront" to be a reasonable name. Let's recall; she originally went by Lady Liberty, which doesn't suggest electricity at all.
Overall I am very happy with the season, but with one caveat: The Church plotline. I absolutely love Goran Visnjic and was thrilled to see him tackle a role like this one. He's also very easy on the eyes. Those are small grievances however, I was starting to feel invested in the Church conspiracy and then FLUPP, head 'sploded and a twist. How overpowered can a character be? Not a fan of that, really. Small caveat though, considering the rest of the expansion, the acting and the setup for season 3. Can't wait to see how the team will tackle the power they're up against...
Just binge watched both seasons these past few days. Really enjoyed it.
The unveiling of the head popper, just can't wrap my head around why they did what they did in a prior big event... whether they're working with Edgar or not either way it doesn't make sense... o.O
The showrunner Kripke said in an interview it doesn't mean anything, they just thought it was funny.
I just finished season 2. It felt like they kind of lost their way halfway through the season, like there were a bunch of ideas they had but it never really came together that well. Stormfront's racism was really badly done, it was like the PG version of racism so it made her feel ridiculous as this big evil Nazi.
Last edited by Nellise; 2020-10-22 at 02:39 PM.
Just watched Season 1 Episode 2 of The Boys.
The Boys premiered on July 26, 2019 on Amazon Prime.
I know I'm late. I'm always late.
Click for my thoughts on episode (I use spoiler tags if you still haven't watched the show lol:
Hughie should have at least shielded himself from the explosion blast so he won't be all covered in Translucent's guts.
At least cover yourself, Hughie." "With a blanket or something or going behind a desk, going behind an object before detonating Transuclent. That way you won't have to shower off Translucent's blood and guts off of you right after.
After Hughie detonates Transuclent, I was thinking: "Oh, that's why this episode is called Cherry. Cherry bomb lol. Nice."
Remember him from Xena lol. He's an amazing actor!
Last edited by monkfailz; 2020-10-26 at 08:11 PM.
My cool monk videos: https://www.youtube.com/@monkfailzproductions
I think the most logical reasoning is that poor writing is to blame for a LOT of the inconsistencies (which are littered throughout the second season), not that there's some good in-universe explanation. Quite a lot of what happens in season 2 is either out-of-character in comparison to season 1, contrived against common sense just to make plot happen, or just blatant platform messaging.
As is with the specific scenario in question, it's fairly easy to see that what happens is just because the script says so, not because someone with Stormfront's mentality and character would actually do what she did. The Boys should've been dead a bunch of times this season with how certain scenes/scenarios were set up, but every time the supes get depowered in the moment or forget they have their powers (especially Homelander's powers) just so the plot would go on. Basically, the writers are relying on plot armor a LOT this season, and that's rather disappointing. The writers are showing that they don't think about the consequences or trying to make scenarios plausible enough within the rules of the universe, it's just more of "I want X to happen, so let's suspend previously established rules and logic...". While the first season did have its issues, the second seasons is way worse in this regard.
“Society is endangered not by the great profligacy of a few, but by the laxity of morals amongst all.”
“It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the 'right' to education, the 'right' to health care, the 'right' to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville