You're being deliberately obtuse.
What is meant by "the facts don't agree with you" is that your argument does not agree with the facts, which means your argument is objectively, determinably false and thus, without merit.
There's no reason to bring that up, other than an attempt to carry water for and defend a murderer.Yes, it's completely irrelevant to the true point that both helped people. Before shooting and being shot, respectively.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loca...oting/2329610/Include them then. I have seen nothing incriminating from any of his social media mentions, and "guilt by association" is quite weak given that he wasn't normally part of that group.
Just for example. Posting "blue lives matter" content, for instance, demonstrates a history of white supremacism and support for police brutality.
Such information was also referenced by the charging documents, though the DA's office is keeping that information close to the vest, until trial, apparently.