Originally Posted by
Blznsmri
>Implying WoW is a bigger success because they allowed mounts.
>Implying WoW, AC, AoC, Rift, Aion, FFXI, FFXIV, (and so on) are exactly the same as Guild Wars 1
>Implying a MMO is better purely for the fact that it includes mounts. (Again, subjective).
For all we know, those undead horses could be franken-horses and that there never were live horses to begin with. They also could have been unique to Orr, which kinda got nuked...
Then you really don't grasp the ridiculousness of that idea...
And if I don't even want to see people on mounts?