Seems like a sensible and rational system.
Seems like a sensible and rational system.
Communist governments have to terrorize half their population to remain in power.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Run out of money to redistribute, people get tried of living with that stone age shit and want capitalism.
Because it was never tried.
All right, gentleperchildren, let's review. The year is 2024 - that's two-zero-two-four, as in the 21st Century's perfect vision - and I am sorry to say the world has become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself, run by a bunch of still-masked clots ridden infertile senile sissies who want the Last Ukrainian to die so they can get on with the War on China, with some middle-eastern genocide on the side
It needs more energy and effort to be properly implemented compared to feudalism and capitalism. An endeavor which none is willing to commit to.
edit: In before someone notices "Finnish" in OP's name and claims "lol, Finland is already communust!1".
It's actually very simple. Communism depends on state actors acting in the best interests of all. Where in human history has that ever worked?
The system has rarely been fully enacted. It's an eventuality in Communism.
Communism probably worked a long, long time ago, in small villages, or even smaller groups of people, where everyone's survival was dependent on each other. There might've been a leader in those groups, but most likely, since we managed to survive, they all pulled together, and that's pretty much communism for ya.
I'm pretty sure every communist country had a healthy black market, black markets being pure capitalism.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland