Page 11 of 22 FirstFirst ...
9
10
11
12
13
21
... LastLast
  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by Nixx View Post
    That guy was nowhere near as restrained as this guy was and even after they initially shot him, they still tried to take him into custody rather than simply execute him.
    I think you are refusing to even acknowledge that the time it takes to differentiate under control and not under control when a deadly weapon is involved could result in the officers life. They aren't robots. Given what you say here, should the officers wait until a shot has actually been fired before they draw their weapon? Be it a gun, a taser, a baton, etc?

    If we cannot differentiate the line, then how can we call for the police to change their behavior?

  2. #202
    Quote Originally Posted by supertony51 View Post
    Well, you see, he is a convicted felon who is not legally able to carry a firearm.
    Cops didn't know that prior to shooting him.

  3. #203
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrysia View Post
    It is a disproportionately black problem even when you adjust for crime rates.

    - - - Updated - - -



    The video I saw I don't see how that's possible. One officer was kneeling on his left hand and another had his right in a vice grip.
    Guess no one will really ever know.

    As for me, I'll take the word of the police officer.

    I mean, I know it sounds rough, but I shed absolutely no years over his death. He spent his entire adult life brutalizing and victimizing people. Hes been convicted multiple times for battery and aggravated battery, domestic violence, rape (as a 20 year old he impregnated a 14 year old) and failed to register as a sex offender.

    The world lost nothing of value with his death.

    Ultimately, I blame our criminal justice system. How the fuck was this guy not in prison for his offences?

  4. #204
    Quote Originally Posted by dubious_doomhammer View Post
    Cops didn't know that prior to shooting him.
    Cops have an uncanny ability of accidentally killing criminals without knowing it.

    Michael Brown, Eric Gardner, Alton Sterling, Philando Castile. We have the Mr. Magoo of police forces.

  5. #205
    Quote Originally Posted by Thetruth1400 View Post
    Your second part is something quite often overlooked by the anti cop crowd. The entire reason the cops were there in the first place is this convicted criminal was pointing an illegal gun at other people, therefore 911 was called and they had to come out. Additionally, he resisted arrest and even shrugged off a taser shot. If he wasn't a criminal, acting like a criminal, he'd have been fine.

    That aside, your first comment makes me sick. You and everyone else do not, in any way, shape, or form deserve access to the any additional footage, even if it makes it clear as day that he is innocent. The only people that deserve access to that footage are the cops, internal investigation, and anyone involved in the legal proceedings that I'm sure will crop up. In those proceedings, guilt or innocence will be proven and society needs to just accept that with the additional footage, his innocence was proven, not resort to their "Oh, another cop getting off killing an innocent." bullshit because they were proven innocent in a court of law.



    1) Again, just because you're nosy doesn't mean you should have the right to the dash cam footage just to satiate your curiosity.
    2) Life and Death can happen in a split second. It doesn't matter if the cop said "Don't reach" and the guy started reaching and didn't stop, or if the cop said "Don't reach" and the guy started to reach 10 seconds later, in both instances the cop had to make that snap decision which could have cost him his life due to a non compliant suspect.
    I guess you don't understand freedom of the press

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Gib Lover View Post
    Cops have an uncanny ability of accidentally killing criminals without knowing it.

    Michael Brown, Eric Gardner, Alton Sterling, Philando Castile. We have the Mr. Magoo of police forces.
    I don't think you understand the difference between accidental and neutralizing a threat.

  6. #206
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    I don't think you understand the difference between accidental and neutralizing a threat.
    I'm pro cop in almost all of these situations, I actually struggle to remember one I didn't feel like the shooting was justified.

    I just more so mean they shoot and kill someone and the public is outraged, then it turns out the person was a huge piece of shit. Like our police just stumble into a violent criminal and end up in an altercation.

  7. #207
    Quote Originally Posted by dubious_doomhammer View Post
    Cops didn't know that prior to shooting him.
    Your point?

    The cops were called because he was threatening people with a gun.


    Which is obviously illegal.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by dubious_doomhammer View Post
    Cops didn't know that prior to shooting him.
    Your point?

    The cops were called because he was threatening people with a gun.


    Which is obviously illegal.

  8. #208
    The Insane Dug's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    15,636
    Quote Originally Posted by Spagetto View Post
    You don't need to aim to shoot someone, nor do you need to pull the gun out of your pocket to shoot it.
    This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever read.

  9. #209
    Quote Originally Posted by Torgent View Post


    Wow! Look at that gun! Or maybe it's a missingno pokemon. We really have no idea.
    I'm sorry but where exactly is the gun in this picture? Because I'm looking and don't clearly see a gun anywhere. I'm guessing it's that blurry area right next to the cops blurry arm?

    Seriously, without any real context of what that was a shot of (I could tell the part in the upper left was a car, and I was pretty sure the bottom right area was the front of the car) it took me awhile to decipher what was all in this picture. I saw the foot in the bottom, figured out that was a cops arm (based by the all black area) and then finally figured out where his body was.

    But overall, this is terrible evidence of a gun and I'm willing to bet if you showed this to most people, without mentioning there was a gun in this picture, the vast majority of them wouldn't see a gun.

  10. #210
    Quote Originally Posted by Brubear View Post
    I'm sorry but where exactly is the gun in this picture? Because I'm looking and don't clearly see a gun anywhere. I'm guessing it's that blurry area right next to the cops blurry arm?

    Seriously, without any real context of what that was a shot of (I could tell the part in the upper left was a car, and I was pretty sure the bottom right area was the front of the car) it took me awhile to decipher what was all in this picture. I saw the foot in the bottom, figured out that was a cops arm (based by the all black area) and then finally figured out where his body was.

    But overall, this is terrible evidence of a gun and I'm willing to bet if you showed this to most people, without mentioning there was a gun in this picture, the vast majority of them wouldn't see a gun.
    The gun is supposed to be in the cop's hand. Yet we can't clearly see it, like that other poster said he could. Even went as far to say that the people who can't clearly see a gun are blind.

    I think you misunderstood my post, I was mocking him.

  11. #211
    Quote Originally Posted by Nexx226 View Post
    Because if they're demanding to see it and they're not allowed to, it makes sense they would make a public uproar about it
    Unless that standard operating procedures...

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Gib Lover View Post
    I just more so mean they shoot and kill someone and the public is outraged, then it turns out the person was a huge piece of shit.
    I know Im about to be accused of harassing you again but in spite of that, the bolded part is not a reason to be killed and you become said pos if you believe that.

  12. #212
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenik View Post
    Lets be clear, you have no idea what they pull out.
    You'd have to be a hardcore conspiracy theorist to think that wasn't the gun. They'd have to have the foresight to pull something vaguely gunlike out of the pocket during the event, then threaten the shop owner into telling people they found a gun in the pocket, then they'd have to find Alton Sterling's actual gun, wherever it was, and falsely book it into evidence.

    The chances that they didn't just pull the gun out of his pocket, like it appears in the video, are astronomically low.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  13. #213
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    You'd have to be a hardcore conspiracy theorist to think that wasn't the gun.
    No, I just rely on evidence and proof, of which we have little of either.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    The chances that they didn't just pull the gun out of his pocket, like it appears in the video, are astronomically low.
    Sturdy enough to hold up in a court of law, right?

  14. #214
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Jingoism View Post
    It stands to reason that it was a gun, otherwise it wouldn't have been taken from his pocket.
    And they wouldn't have then had the gun to later book into evidence to corroborate their story that he had a gun.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  15. #215
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenik View Post
    Sturdy enough to hold up in a court of law, right?
    If they have the actual gun as evidence, absolutely. You think the cops would be going around telling everyone he had a gun if they couldn't produce the gun?
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  16. #216
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    If they have the actual gun as evidence, absolutely. You think the cops would be going around telling everyone he had a gun if they couldn't produce the gun?
    Thats the beauty of stand you ground laws, Reeve. There doesnt have to be a gun. The police only need to perceive a threat to their lives before theyre justified, in the eyes of the law, pulling the trigger.

  17. #217
    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenik View Post
    I know Im about to be accused of harassing you again but in spite of that, the bolded part is not a reason to be killed and you become said pos if you believe that.
    It's pretty sad that you respond sarcastically saying I'm going to falsely accuse of you harassment, then you call me a piece of shit. Do you have no self awareness at all?

    Being a piece of shit is not grounds for being executed, it is just objectively better that someone killed by police, in a justified or non-justified way, turns out to be a career criminal than not one.

    Disagree all you want, I'm sure you will just respond to this post with more unneeded insults.

  18. #218
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenik View Post
    Thats the beauty of stand you ground laws, Reeve. There doesnt have to be a gun. The police only need to perceive a threat to their lives before theyre justified, in the eyes of the law, pulling the trigger.
    That doesn't change whether or not there was a gun in this case.

    To be clear, I'm not saying the shooting was justified. I'm saying that the idea that there was no gun requires a great deal of conspiracy nonsense to make sense.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  19. #219
    Quote Originally Posted by Gib Lover View Post
    It's pretty sad that you respond sarcastically saying I'm going to falsely accuse of you harassment
    Falsely would be correct, sacastically youd be incorrect. Thats been your response to every reply Ive gotten from you. I expected it.

  20. #220

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •