Yes, Trump is that much of a fuck up. Giving examples of how Bush and Obama did, doesn't really help your point. It makes it seem less partisan and more about who Trump is.
We had an election where it was almost unanimous, bipartisan agreement that Hillary and Trump were the worst two candidates in history. Why is it a surprise that the result is the most scrutinized president? Logic, based on bipartisan agreement, the worst candidate to win an election in American history, would result in the most scrutiny in history.
I have yet to hear from an "awoke" independent like the OP or a Trump supporter, how that changed when Trump won. How exactly do you go from the winner between two of the worst candidates in US history, to being surprised that they are the worst president in history?
- - - Updated - - -
See Trump taking credit for unemployment dropping by nearly 40% when he became president and the economy finally recovering from the Great Recession as soon as he won. Also, the pay off in Indiana and shutting down US interest in TPP.