Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
5
13
... LastLast
  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    You're already paying for Viagra, and that really doesn't have any health benefits.

    You have the internet at your disposal, stop being ignorant.
    Making a problem worse isn't making it better...

  2. #42
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    It's almost as if BC had other uses than just not having kids, like regulating menstruation.
    For the vast majority of women, its only taken for its birth control effect.

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    Your personal health isn't affected in any way by me not liking condoms.
    you're right not me personally but I find it incredibly irresponsible, borderline dangerous to tell people not to use them.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    Because it's a barrier between you and your partner, less intimate.
    Oh no, this condom makes me so far out of touch with my partner that sex turns from super awesome to super terrible.

  5. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    People can, and should be able to be more responsible for their medical decisions.
    People can't check for the things that doctors can and don't know the things that doctors know.

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Except knowing what meds interact negatively with other meds is generally not publicly available, and a person risks fucking themselves up because of it. You dont fuck with hormones, period.
    Why not make it publicly available? I support a fully-informed public. If a company wants to hide the dangers of a product, then it is responsible (criminally) for the outcome, problem solved.

  7. #47
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    You're already paying for Viagra, and that really doesn't have any health benefits.
    Viagra has medical benefits too.

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Sky High View Post
    you're right not me personally but I find it incredibly irresponsible, borderline dangerous to tell people not to use them.
    Hardly. If you're exclusive with someone then using condoms would just be silly.

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    People can't check for the things that doctors can and don't know the things that doctors know.
    It's not difficult to find information on various drugs, and the risk of possible interactions with other medications.

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Hanablossom View Post
    Oh no, this condom makes me so far out of touch with my partner that sex turns from super awesome to super terrible.
    You might not care much about it but others do. No reason to be so flippant about it just because you don't care about it.

  11. #51
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,942
    Quote Originally Posted by GoblinP View Post
    For the vast majority of women, its only taken for its birth control effect.
    Fuck the rest amiright

    Let's stop covering painkillers, because a lot of people abuse those as feel-good drugs too.

  12. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    Hardly. If you're exclusive with someone then using condoms would just be silly.
    What if they're not exclusive with you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    You might not care much about it but others do. No reason to be so flippant about it just because you don't care about it.
    Oh I do care, it feels different from using a condom and not using one. But going all extremist on the effects of what it does to you speaks volumes.

  13. #53
    Moderator Crissi's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    32,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Why not make it publicly available? I support a fully-informed public. If a company wants to hide the dangers of a product, then it is responsible (criminally) for the outcome, problem solved.
    Because your solution puts people at risk. In this case, your "freedom" is actually worse than gov't regulation.

    but I know how you work, and I dont feel like getting into BUT MAH FREEDOMS argument.

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Hanablossom View Post
    What if they're not exclusive with you?
    Then it's not being exclusive...

  15. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Because your solution puts people at risk. In this case, your "freedom" is actually worse than gov't regulation.

    but I know how you work, and I dont feel like getting into BUT MAH FREEDOMS argument.
    My solution allows for people to put themselves at risk. I'm not saying they shouldn't go to a doctor, merely that they should be able to make more of those decisions on their own.

  16. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    It's not difficult to find information on various drugs, and the risk of possible interactions with other medications.
    Yeah, let's just incur massive costs on society because you think people should be personally responsible to know what medicines interacts with what and how, what the side effects are.

  17. #57
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    People can, and should be able to be more responsible for their medical decisions.
    Yeah, those loosers who spent more than half a decade in school learning to be doctors, We should just embrace DIY healtcare.
    It's not that difficult for people to be informed of their medical issues, as well as the dangers of specific medications.
    You do know a unintended medical interactions is a serious problem? (because, A, we don't know all interactions, B, most doctors don't know them all)
    Once again, it's just another way to have more government involvement than is actually needed. Let people be responsible for themselves.
    It's a way of keeping people from harming themselves - It has nothing to do with government.

  18. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    People can, and should be able to be more responsible for their medical decisions.

    - - - Updated - - -



    It's not that difficult for people to be informed of their medical issues, as well as the dangers of specific medications.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Once again, it's just another way to have more government involvement than is actually needed. Let people be responsible for themselves.
    Yes, no one has ever miss used/abused drugs before. Addicts don't exist and people can be responsible. Also everyone can be a 1%er

  19. #59
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,942
    Quote Originally Posted by GoblinP View Post
    Viagra has medical benefits too.
    Sure, it helps with jet lag in hamsters.

  20. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by Freighter View Post
    Yeah, let's just incur massive costs on society because you think people should be personally responsible to know what medicines interacts with what and how, what the side effects are.
    They can still go to a doctor if they like. If you don't want to make those decisions on your own, then don't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •