Well, I only said something because there are a lot of people out there that do believe you need at least 4 cores to even be able to play games. If they read what you said, that would support that idea and they would believe it even more. It is simply not true. Dual Cores are still mostly fine for gaming for at least another couple years and likely another 4-6.
Source:
http://wccftech.com/intels-8th-gener...per-threading/
Coffee Lake i3: 4 cores 8 threads
Coffee lake i5: 6 Cores 6 threads
Why doesn't that make sense to me? Based on the threads, wouldn't you want a i3 over an i5?
thats not confirmed (and ppl think a 4c/8t @ 4.0 Ghz for i3 prices is too good to be true and would destroy both Intels own offerings and Ryzens 3/5 in price/perf .. especially since it would also feature an IGP, which can be pretty important in some cases, not needing to pay for a dGPU if you just need to run basic desktop/HTPC tasks or very light games)
but no, for pure gaming, all else equal, I would take 6c/6t over 4c/8t
plus that i3, if true, is likely to be locked, while the i5 would feature an unlocked K model
- - - Updated - - -
http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-140322-1-1.html
this is the source I reckon
Last edited by Life-Binder; 2017-08-07 at 02:31 PM.
It's almost like Intel is trying to cure any buyer's remorse anyone would have by going Ryzen/Threadripper right now instead of waiting for their next scam.
They're not gonna cannibalize their X299 line. So expect ~$370 for the 8700K. And $120-200 for a Z370? mainboard that will be replaced in Q1-2018.
Last edited by Sorshen; 2017-08-07 at 04:29 PM.
Personally, I think it would make more sense if the Pentiums moved up to 4c/4t, i3's went 4c/8t, i5s went 6c/6t and 8c/8t with i7s being 6+c/12+t, but since when has the tech industry made any sense?
MMO-Champion Rules and Guidelines
While you are probably right, I would think for non-educated user it would be a marketing nightmare. Think of the middle aged mom going in. Saying "but the that has more threads & its cheaper. Why shouldn't I just get that?". Then explaining why less is better to the middle aged mom is going to be a nightmare.
yeah but on the box it will probably just list the cores
While it's not entirely true, all that need to be explained is that with only 4 physical cores, those 8 threads are basically 8 half cores. With a 6 core, you get 6 full threads, not 8 half threads.
Yes, in reality it's more like having 8 cores operating at 70%, but that's just it, no matter how you look at it, it's still just 4 cores. 6 cores is more than 4 cores.
Last edited by Lathais; 2017-08-07 at 06:10 PM.
Not for PC Parts. Talk to me about safety supplies and equipment or work boots though. I get what you are saying though. A real sales person would be trying to sell the higher priced product, not the one that is best for the consumer. In this forum, I always try to help people choose what's best for them, not for intel/retailers.
Hyper threading isn't really reliable in terms of performance gain. It depends entirely on load type and sometimes it ranges from 0% to 40%. Average wise for Intel I believe it was around 25%. With physical core it's more reliable which imo makes a better choice. You're guaranteed a certain performance as opposed to HT which is more sporadic and load dependent.
I am more excited about laptops getting 4 cores baseline in 2018, because all current 4/8 laptops are either cheaply made or super expensive, but other than that I do plan updating my desktop next year, so I won't mind going with 6/6 or 6/12 Intel CPU there.
I think its too late to get any 14nm now, its too old (unless you really have to upgrade) .. getting a 6700K/6600K on launch was by far the best decision to make as far as a gaming 14nm CPU goes .. you would have already had a super fast gaming CPU for ~2 years, that OCes well and is only slightly behind 7700K and ahead of Ryzens and most other Intels in games
Ice Lake 10+nm should be set for H2 2018 and theres even potential for 7nm Zen 2 in very late 2018 (maybe), so might as well wait for 7/10nm
the one thing that worries me is that according to this:
10+nm (Ice Lake) will offer about the same perf as 14++nm (Coffee) at lower power
and only 10++nm (Tiger Lake in 2019-ish) will get a decent perf boost over Coffee
this is only from process though, not counting arch changes I guess
also, official news:
https://newsroom.intel.com/news-rele...cessor-family/
https://www.techpowerup.com/235943/i...y-on-august-21
if 8700K is coming first then maybe its for September-OctoberOn Aug. 21, Intel will unveil the 8th Generation Intel Core processor family on Facebook Live.
1. Don't be caught in the dark. Learn how the 8th Gen Intel Core processor family will offer blazing fast performance.
2. Hear directly from Gregory Bryant, senior vice president of the Client Computing Group at Intel, and others about the details on the latest processor family and what it can help you do.
3. Discover how immersive experiences will bring you from spectator to participant with 8th Gen Intel Core processor capabilities.
4. Don't just take our word for it. See the power of 8th Gen Intel Core technology come to life in the hands of a VR creator and imaging technologist.
5. Get a sneak peek at some of the amazing system designs based on 8th Gen Intel Core processors.
6. Start planning for what new 8th Gen Intel Core processor-based device to purchase in the holiday season and even before.
7. Don't worry, you won't miss the solar eclipse. Tune in before it descends upon Oregon and the West Coast and then makes its way across the U.S.
8. See how the 8th Gen Intel Core processor is designed for today and what comes next.