Trump already had a school with his name on it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ersity-lawsuit
It didn't end up so well.
Trump already had a school with his name on it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ersity-lawsuit
It didn't end up so well.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
I've no interest in jumping back into this thread, but this was essentially the point was unsuccessfully trying to put out to begin with. Despite our argument earlier, I think we actually feel similarly about this case. At least in this instance; that is to say I don't feel there is any need to honor the Confederacy whatsoever. But respecting the people that fought and died, and mourning the tragedy that was the Civil War is important.
Just wanted to post this, since I saw some of your other posts on this page and respect your for them. Specifically, I want to apologize if I was rude earlier. I am pretty sure I misread a lot of what you were posting in the frenzy where I was tiptoeing through every response since every word I posted here was being picked apart. Take it as you will!
Why not name it the Jefferson Davis ? The first POTUS that ended his term in drag ?
Jefferson Davis ending in dignity his tenure
Idiots: those liberals are trying to erase history!
Same idiots: why can’t those liberals get over slavery, or genocide of the Indians, or the holocaust, or whatever!?!?
The problem with this rather pathetic excuse is that it doesn't address the core of what George Washington is famous for in the first place. I am all for taking historical characters in their full historical context, but that doesn't mean glorifying the worst parts of them. George Washington did some absolutely terrible things in regard to slavery and his plantation, and it would be wrong to honor him for it. However I am fine with honoring him for his contributions to the nation as a whole, which was absolutely massive, and can't really be overstated.
On the other hand confederate generals are typically known for nothing else. Take away their fight to destroy the union to preserve slavery, and you have nothing historically noteworthy about these individuals, at least not to the degree that justifies statues and school names. A cause as fundamentally flawed as the confederacy is not redeemable. Even worse, the legacy of the confederacy has been used to provide further control of black southerners for generations, making any homage to the confederacy immediately suspicious. Leave the history of the confederacy in museums, battlefields, and graveyards. It has no place on our schools or in our town centers.
You obviously know nothing about Robert E Lee, much like most Americans. And on the topic of Washington, he was regarded as being notoriously bad to slaves. But hey, let's only pick and choose what we want to look at of what people did. You are assuming that everyone in the confederacy owned slaves or fought for slave ownership, which is simply not true. But why would you consider that?
You do know there is almost no one in this tread that disagrees with you right? There are some like my self that don't see why it should be named after Obama seeing he also did horrible things (I personally think he was a great president and with that he had to make very hard decisions, I don't agree with some of them but overall I think hes been pretty damn decent) instead of one of the other examples brought up in this tread.
You must not have actually read through the thread, because if you did, you would have seen that the overwhelming majority support taking the Confederate general's name off the school. As for how people feel about it being named after Obama, I couldn't care less about that.