Stupid woman should have stayed in the kitchen and by the way those concentration camps made people concentrate better.
Infracted: Please do not make sexist or inappropriate comments.
Last edited by Pendulous; 2012-12-07 at 12:16 PM.
Are you implying, even for a single moment, that a 17-22 years old guy working in a tower in a camp, is even vaguely and remotely comparable in any way to the murderous, brutal, inhumane acts against a nation AND the world that were the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan in 1945?
It's probably on your "liberation" list as well isn't it?
indeed, not to mention that he probably wouldn't even be noted as a hero if he did anyway.
He would have just been some guard who got shot for not complying.
heroic acts are put forth by those that witness them, pretty sure he would just have been executed and that's that.
hang the bastard...no excuses
Let's ignore the fact that hounding an 88-year old that is hospitalized is just a waste of resources no matter his crimes. This Susan Siegal seems to have no idea of what she's talknig about. "could have requested a transfer back to eastern front"? That was feared by the german troops as a slow death penalty. Walking away from service or defying service would have earned him exactly that transfer, if not just a bullet to the head. This lawyer seems to be completely disconnected from the reality suggesting any of these as option. "walking away from service" in the SS during WW2? That's going to end well for you.Justice Department lawyer Susan Siegal questioned whether Geiser's service as a camp guard was truly involuntary. She said he could have requested a transfer back to the Russian front, where he was initially serving, or that he could have simply walked away from service or defied immoral orders. She said the Nuremberg trials after World War II and military code established the precedent that following immoral orders is not an adequate defense.
A crime is a form of behaviour that is considered socially unacceptable.
But the boundaries of socially acceptable behaviour are very different in war compared to peacetime.
If you insist on applying your modern peacetime-norms to wartime behaviour, we should imprison half the Allied soldiers too.
---------- Post added 2012-12-07 at 01:35 PM ----------
When I read stuff like this, I wish there was still an Eastern Front we could send people like Susan Siegal to. That would decisively end the discussion: She could prove her point by going and getting herself killed, or, much more likely, cede it by refusing to go.
Walking away form ss servises. or disobaying. was a death sentens.. the germans shot and hong around 100.000 of there own soilders.. during the war..
I have to say. Being a lawyer and having to say stuff like this to an 88 years old man really makes me wonder how the fuck can she sleep at night.
He wasn't a hero. A hero would stand up and get shot.
That said, he is no criminal. He didn't do anything wrong. Soldiers obey orders.
He's being shamefully punished for not sacrificing his life for idealism, something that most human beings wouldn't do.
Going back to WWII we have several cases of gruesome war crimes committed by the allied forces as well. dont recall them getting any time for those crimes
Dachau massacre April 29th 1945
Biscari massacre f 1943 ( here we at least got 1 person convicted)
But the talk of they did this or that well all i say is make sure we dont forget the war criminals on the Allied side as well
Ultimately this man was just doing his job. Even if he was considered "One of the bad guys" he was serving his country. By the time the extent of Hitlers insanity came to light (Which wasn't straight away) far too many people were too invested (Families involved, etc) to simply say "Thanks, but I don't want to Hitler." It didn't work like that. And all of this talk about "being a hero and dying so he didn't have to kill anyone" is just daft. It's easy to say "Be a hero", but its much, much harder to actually do it. If this man was still serving as a Nazi, killing people, I'd say deport him and let him be punished, but I personally feel he should just be allowed to live what few years he had left to himself.
you got that right. look at the German Generals even, they feared for their life so they did what hitler wanted them to do even though they knew it would fail. If they had their way and ran their armies the way they intended i hate to say it but you could of possibly seen the world under the nazi regime. Germany had Arguably the best generals in the world.