if philippines had oil, the usa would already be invading by now
K
http://www.crchealth.com/addiction/d...on_is_illness/
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publicatio...-use-addiction
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/...ppendixa_5.htm
Kindly don't presume to tell others that their statement is infantilizing when you clearly know next to nothing on the subject
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)
Yes, exactly! If a child makes a mistake, mind you a child that's like, 12 years old or less, maybe even 16 or less, then teach them to not do it again.
If an adult (18 and up!) chooses to break the law, and they are apprehended, they deserve consequences. I will admit death without trial is obviously rash, but setting someone up with food and housing for life is a blessing to these people that live on the streets and peddle drugs. Get rid of them.
They're sick? Sure! euthanize like a rabid dog then.
If the threat of death was looming over your head for drug use do you think we would have a drug problem?
There is a heroin epidemic in USA. He should be elected president there as well.
Show me a single person harmed from the simple act of selling a drug. Since you want people to be responsible for their own actions, then selling a drug is a specific action which does not harm others. People who die from drug use are harming themselves, and since they are responsible for their own actions, they should be able to do that. After all, you are the one who said they are doing it on their own. Now you seem to want to hold someone else responsible for that action.
As for robbing people, that is a completely separate action, and the person should be held responsible for it.
Duterte is living proof that a nation can make an even more idiotic choice than electing Trump, so nothing coming from him is particularly surprising. To think of it, I wonder how an election race between the two would go. Much closer than between Trump and Hillary for sure (and it's already somewhat close because Hillary has low likability polls). Mind you, not government elections, putting any of these geniuses near a position of power is sick. An election for the champion of the mentally disturbed asylum sounds more like it. The winner would get electroshocks for a while.
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)
The existence of a law is NEVER a justification for it.
Banning drugs is no different than banning guns, cookies, or fast cars. It's nothing more than one group of asshats trying to force their beliefs onto others.
- - - Updated - - -
And who gets to decide who is trash, and deserves to be purged?
I think eating a cookie is a bad choice, should I arrest and/or kill you for doing it? Should I also kill the guy who sold you the cookie?
- - - Updated - - -
Video games and social media are addictive, should we also have you arrested and killed?
I really do appreciate you not reading the links I provided to keep parroting something in which you're wrong.
I could go into the details of why it's being classified on par with diseases but I have a funny feeling I'd have better luck arguing with this empty cup of tea nearby me
"It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum... and I'm all outta ass."
I'm a British gay Muslim Pakistani American citizen, ask me how that works! (terribly)