Long, irrelevant list snipped.
FBI was investigating Trump. Trump fired him. Anything on your list is irrelevant. to current context.
No fair looking for reasons to justify his firing.
No fair mudslinging.
Firing the person that is investigating you is a tacit admission of guilt.
Here endeth the lesson.
EDIT: Any and all opinions to the contrary must be defended with "Why just after Yates threw the investigation back into the spotlight? If this list of reasons to fire Comey was so long, why was he still the head of the FBI yesterday?" And I'll just tell you now, what ever reasons you give, I'm going to dismiss them as bullshit.
Hes no non-partisan. He was installed by Obama and he has done everything he could to protect Hillary from being indicted and charged for political reasons. Anyone else commits a crime and intent isnt considered (plus we all know Hillary intended to do what she did. You dont accidentally setup a private email server and use it for classified information)
"I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors"
ahahahahahaahah.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
It just doesn't matter to Trump zealots...Congress will find him guilty of treason and they still will believe in their god...
I still can't tell if Trumps admin is a mastermind at manipulating the liberal media or not.
As per usual, Josh Marshall has a very interesting take on the whole situation.
I'll skip to the end.
Screw the popcorn, this calls for Pop-Tarts.In criminal trials there are certain actions defendants can take from which judges will tell juries they can infer guilt. In a political context, this is one of those moments. We are now hearing word from White House officials that the White House is stunned at the backlash at Comey’s firing. Didn’t Democrats think he was doing a bad job? We’re even hearing commentators speculate that maybe this may have been a huge miscalculation. The White House didn’t realize how big a deal this was. In the final analysis I think this will be judged a major miscalculation – just not in the sense they mean. Frankly, no one is that naive. It doesn’t wash.
There is only one reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from the decision to fire Comey: that there is grave wrongdoing at the center of the Russia scandal and that it implicates the President. As I write this, I have a difficult time believing that last sentence myself. But sometimes you have to step back from your assumptions and simply look at what the available evidence is telling you. It’s speaking clearly: the only reasonable explanation is that the President has something immense to hide and needs someone in charge of the FBI who he believes is loyal. Like Jeff Sessions. Like Rod Rosenstein.
Why not, is there really a limit to willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance? There's not a lot of research on the matter, but what there is, shows that people can overlook and rationalize just about anything.
You have Putin supporters cheering him on for assassinating political rivals, is it really that big of a leap to think that Trump's supporters won't ignore any evidence of Russian involvement?