https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Gaming and WoW stuff
It makes perfect sense to kill Thrall. Sylvanas know there's an underground, proto-rebellion forming. Killing one of the would be leaders is a no-brainer. If they had succeeded, no one would have known, ever. They would suspect but they could not prove.
I'm wondering if Sylvanas is intentionally making people go after her.
I mean in 'A Good War' she muses what will happen when she takes the Horde from Saurfang and that it would make him her enemy. Then she turns right around and does just that.
She displays Derek openly while seemingly trying to torture him into slavery, knowing this must rustle several feathers and make Baine at least act against her.
She makes a show of arresting Baine and killing Zelling, specifically in hostile territory and in front of all her allied leaders plus Rexxar.
She sends two assassins into Outland to attack Thrall, who may have left his shamanism behind somewhat, but who still is a trained and seasoned warrior has a wife with him that is a powerful shaman in her own right.
I still refuse to believe that she is simply dumb, so... is her plan to play some kind of bait, leading them into a trap when they finally all come after her?
Otherwise I really want them to update Outland now, Outland Nagrand is just so beautiful and was done justice in that cinematic. Also I liked that Thrall looked a little like movie Durotan.
Loved the cinematic, but I am questioning Sylvanas's motivations here.
I’m wondering if the Twilight hammer has inflitrated the horde and are pushing for the horde to go through another civil war to further weaken any resistance for N’zoths return.
I still think Sylvanas is being used or forced to service by N’zoth indirectly or directly.
If not then blizzard making her villian is just stupid.
I always liked her as hordes “oh shit” button for desperate moments in war.
Is Thrall John Wick? He didnt want to return until some criminals attacked him at his home...then where is his dog ? haha
Last edited by KainneAbsolute; 2019-05-15 at 04:53 PM.
Besides the fact that Thrall's presence ends up being irrelevant since we're told in the next patch even after he joins the rebellion that a majority support Sylvanas, there's just the question of execution. We're expected to believe that invisible, sleepless assassins were followed by an old man and that they didn't just shoot Saurfang in the head while he was asleep and then proceed to do the same thing to a Thrall who couldn't use shamanism and his family afterwards.
Set aside that it was only two guys after Sylvanas had seen Saurfang wreck a whole battalion.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
So Thrall is basically farmer thanos now?
Originally Posted by Boomzy
So Sylvanas is considered somewhat smart, is she not? So she would try to remove a threat that isn't actually a threat... but in doing so, create the threat?
All Sylvanas has to do, is not send anyone, or just send spies. If she did send an emissary, all they have to do is say "Hey Sylvanas is turning up the whoopass on the Horde, please be patient with her" and that's it. But that's not even necessary.
However we have here is the moment that Thrall refuses Saurfang... the assassins then attack, causing Thrall to then join. Sylvanas is supposed to be an intelligent character, but she just created her own enemy in Thrall when there wasn't a need for one.
The only way this cinematic makes sense, is that these assassin's... are actually loyal to Saurfang and he used them to get Thrall to join the Rebellion(But that's not even gonna be the case, because WoW is EVILVSGOOD)
I don't know, ask your 1236453298562938457676 different threads about Thrall in Cataclysm.
Also, this entire argument is nothing more than your petulant straw-man. No one from the "usual crybabies" commended writing at the start of BfA. So what "deflecting" and what "blaming"? Your remark about entitlement on the other hand doesn't even make sense in the context of your nonsensical post.
A still image from Blizzcon will show Ji with a depressed plunger next to him while he is watching an orphanage burn, Blizz will asure us tehre is a different side to the story, and we just need ot wait and see. Following that there will be an elaborate cutscene that shows that not only did Ji blow up the orphanage, but he whispered to every child that Santa didnt exist before he did.
After that there will be a full-length cinematic of Gallywix looking sad to ensure the Horde that not everyone in the Horde agrees with this terrible injustice to the Hordes identity as something other than bloodthirsty savages.
After some complaining from Alliance, we will be assured that the scales will tip back in our favor soon enough, and next we see them, Alliance sets fire to a Horde war camp that openly partook in live vivisection and slavery, Blizz will now claim that Alliance is just as morally grey as the Horde.
Further into the expansion, every patch will be billed as the one where Alliance gets to retaliate, except every time it is preceded by Ji smirking and eating another orphan and puppy kebab while the Horde leaders say nothing.
Thrall will then be brought back again to set things right, and the Alliance will say that next time it is super super serious if they have to spank them again.