Originally Posted by
Shadowmelded
It may be your opinion but it has zero legal standing. She was incapable of giving consent, she cannot be complicit in her own abuse. Just because kids can be precocious doesn't mean that they all are, it's kind of the definition of the word. Now if you're of the opinion that kids are in fact capable of consent prior to the ages of 16, and not just a few but a big enough majority to warrant a change in the age of consent, then please state your fact based and well reasoned case, until then, jamming your fingers in your ears and going 'lalala this girl deserved it, well done judge' is just inflammatory.
The adult in that situation has a defense of not being able to give informed consent because he was not fully aware of the situation due to the deception on the part of the minor. Please stop trying to make it out to be a common occurrence.