1. #13781
    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    Non-Fox channels aren't even broadcasting his rallies anymore, just grabbing the most retarded shit he's saying and debunking it afterwards.

    They're not even broadcasting his "coronavirus" briefings since he cut the actual doctors.
    Yup even msnbc that had been showing the coronavirus things fully is at the immediately cut away when he starts spouting nonsense going that is totally false we are moving to normal programing we will let you know if there was anything worth looking at.

  2. #13782
    Trump Says Supreme Court Needs Ninth Justice to Decide Election

    Sure you generally have Election discussion about the POTUS trying to tell us he wants it to go to SCOTUS so he steals this election.
    Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!

  3. #13783
    Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid Android View Post
    Trump Says Supreme Court Needs Ninth Justice to Decide Election

    Sure you generally have Election discussion about the POTUS trying to tell us he wants it to go to SCOTUS so he steals this election.
    They need to delay this shit
    as much as possible
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  4. #13784
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid Android View Post
    Trump Says Supreme Court Needs Ninth Justice to Decide Election

    Sure you generally have Election discussion about the POTUS trying to tell us he wants it to go to SCOTUS so he steals this election.
    It's just unbelievable the horror him and his ilk have created. And even if we win out, Biden wins, and is in the White House - we still have all the people who enable this used car salesman of a grifter. People eat it up because they are too intellectually dishonest to admit being wrong.

    Part of me wonders if they are sitting in the White House Ops room making up the most outlandish shit possible, pushing it out there, and continuing to see their dipshit followers eating up.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    They need to delay this shit
    as much as possible
    Technically speaking, it takes two votes of a GOP led quorum. The process takes about 30 minutes.

    The Democrats have no way to delay it. Romney being the moral whore he is, stating he'll vote, means we're done.

  5. #13785
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    It's just unbelievable the horror him and his ilk have created. And even if we win out, Biden wins, and is in the White House - we still have all the people who enable this used car salesman of a grifter. People eat it up because they are too intellectually dishonest to admit being wrong.

    Part of me wonders if they are sitting in the White House Ops room making up the most outlandish shit possible, pushing it out there, and continuing to see their dipshit followers eating up.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Technically speaking, it takes two votes of a GOP led quorum. The process takes about 30 minutes.

    The Democrats have no way to delay it. Romney being the moral whore he is, stating he'll vote, means we're done.
    Worst case is Trump tries to call the Election that night since it will take time for possibly all mail-in votes to be counted. So let's he wins the Electoral College this way and immediately asks for a Supreme Court ruling. I mean this is pretty simple scenario.
    Democrats are the best! I will never ever question a Democrat again. I LOVE the Democrats!

  6. #13786
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,940
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post

    The Democrats have no way to delay it.
    The GOP can't vote if they're locked out of the Senate *taps head*

  7. #13787
    Pandaren Monk masterhorus8's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid Android View Post
    Worst case is Trump tries to call the Election that night since it will take time for possibly all mail-in votes to be counted. So let's he wins the Electoral College this way and immediately asks for a Supreme Court ruling. I mean this is pretty simple scenario.
    Do we have any numbers in from the states that already have the polls open? Not in regards to the results, but just the turnout.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    The GOP can't vote if they're locked out of the Senate *taps head*
    Lock the doors and hide the keys?
    9

  8. #13788
    Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid Android View Post
    Trump Says Supreme Court Needs Ninth Justice to Decide Election

    Sure you generally have Election discussion about the POTUS trying to tell us he wants it to go to SCOTUS so he steals this election.
    Trump just flat out admitting he wants to steal the election is an interesting strategy.

    Well, it would be if his dumbass followers actually gave a fuck.

  9. #13789
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid Android View Post
    Worst case is Trump tries to call the Election that night since it will take time for possibly all mail-in votes to be counted. So let's he wins the Electoral College this way and immediately asks for a Supreme Court ruling. I mean this is pretty simple scenario.
    I could see Trump doing it. But this case would be pretty clear. States have the right to certify their ballots. Most will wait that out, including the majority of battleground states.

    However - your scenario is easy to generate (being election night), and it might not go the way I'm stating. The fact that we're having this conversation is utterly frightening.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Belize View Post
    The GOP can't vote if they're locked out of the Senate *taps head*
    That's just about the only way the Dems could stop it. lol

  10. #13790
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,112
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    Last edited by Ghostpanther; 2020-09-23 at 11:01 PM.
    " If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
    The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams

  11. #13791
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is until the Supreme Court rules against this decision.
    Yeah, still don't care. If it makes it so that mass shooting Trump supporters aren't able to kill more people, I am all for it.

  12. #13792
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    How bad of a shot do you need to be to need more than 10 rounds for self defense?

  13. #13793
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    Didn't you just say that bump stocks aren't guns? Are magazines guns now?

  14. #13794
    Quote Originally Posted by Nelinrah View Post
    How bad of a shot do you need to be to need more than 10 rounds for self defense?
    Alot. I mean a typical gun toting, black fearing conservative probably believes they are more resistant to gunshots like Rand Paul believes Asians are more resistant to Corona viruses. A mean a frail whit cop had to put 7 point blank rounds into the back of Jacob Blake and only paralyzed him. So definitely more than 10.

    Seriously these conservafrauds are embarrassing.

  15. #13795
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    Trump just admitted he's planning to steal the election, literally, and you think anyone cares about the vernacular of magazine laws?

  16. #13796
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    Yeah, still don't care. If it makes it so that mass shooting Trump supporters aren't able to kill more people, I am all for it.
    Fine if you do not care. But millions of owners of such do and should take this one as part of his policies which do violate the constitution according to the system which defines what is unconstitutional. Personal opinions until that decision is overruled, are only that.

    And for those who do know some history on the subject, the Parkland School shooter used 10 round magazines for his AR-15. And the single highest school shooting, the shooter used 2 handguns to kill over 30 students.
    " If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
    The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams

  17. #13797
    Just let the U.K hold a referendum on Brenter, lads. We'll take over the US. Our Government is incompetent but even in their conservative form right now we'll still repeal the 2A entirely, protect abortion rights and ensure same-sex marriage is legal. You know you want it.

  18. #13798
    https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1308896562035204098

    JUST IN: Asked if he'd "commit to making sure that there is a peaceful transferral of power after the election," Pres. Trump says, "Well, we're going to have to see what happens."
    Remove this man from office.

  19. #13799
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    Trump just admitted he's planning to steal the election, literally, and you think anyone cares about the vernacular of magazine laws?
    Worse is all these Trump cock lickers would be rioting in the streets of Trump was a Democrat or if any Dem president did a fraction of the benign stuff. Seriously these guys had shit hemorrhages over a Tan suit, dijon mustard, and doing an appropriate bow. Imagine if Obama made the misogynistic comments Trump did. Yet these guys have lost all credibility any any minuscule amount of respect I may have had for a few. Absolute wastes of skin all of them.

  20. #13800
    Quote Originally Posted by Valkyrst View Post
    Just let the U.K hold a referendum on Brenter, lads. We'll take over the US. Our Government is incompetent but even in their conservative form right now we'll still repeal the 2A entirely, protect abortion rights and ensure same-sex marriage is legal. You know you want it.
    we promise not to get the canadians involved and burn the white house down either

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •