The west attack by Russia on Kyiv looks like it might be in a real bad way. It was the side that was fucked logistically because there are no train lines so you have to drive supplies down.
made a doodle on goolge maps
This is what is allegely happening its sort of the reverse donbas situation.
If Ukraine can pin those Russians in Irpin and encircle them from behind they are fucked.
There is alot of action around Makariv at the moment not really sure who is in control but it could well be Ukraine. Looks like it could be good news West of Kyiv at least. This is what happens when you think you can wrap something up in a week and 3 weeks later you haven't adjusted.
Who the F cares about that. Can Ukrainian Army use Patriots? No they can't. Can Ukrainian army pilot Western jets? No they can't.
Why do you think there was this whole MiG jets nonsense from two weeks ago? Because that's the only thing Ukrainian pilots can pilot right away. Do you realize how much time it takes for pilot to train piloting something else entirely?
Why do you see West scrambling to find some Soviet-made AA systems like 9K33 Osa to give to Ukraine? Because they know how to operate it from the get go.
You just don't get it. The instructors did not give them classes on how to operate anything more than Javelins or Stingers and the like. That's good, but it's not what can keep Ukrainian cities being turned into rubble.
Last edited by Barzotti; 2022-03-23 at 11:10 AM.
This isn't about trust, it's about what can and cannot be achieved. It's about buying time. Time to equip, time for sanctions, time for Europe to vastly increase military spending etc.
After the 2014 ceasefire agreement at Minsk there was constant shelling on both sides but the frontline itself remained static. There weren't armored assaults. This gave Ukraine 8 years to prepare, and they did.
"Life is one long series of problems to solve. The more you solve, the better a man you become.... Tribulations spawn in life and over and over again we must stand our ground and face them."
Time is in the West's favor on this: Sanctions, military build up, munition stocks etc. Russia would learn some very valuable lessons from this, it is true, but so will Ukraine and the West.
If this war goes on for a few more months Ukraine won't even lose conventionally, they'll run out of ammo long before that. Those Javelins and Stingers the US provided Ukraine? There aren't infinite stocks of them and the West is gonna run of out their stocks to send to Ukraine at this rate pretty quickly and there's problems in ramping up production:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...raine-00019333
"Life is one long series of problems to solve. The more you solve, the better a man you become.... Tribulations spawn in life and over and over again we must stand our ground and face them."
So why would Ukraine negotiate a ceasefire if time is in the West's favor? If time is running out for your enemy, you don't want to stop the situation getting progressively worse for him. You don't want to call it a draw if your chances of winning are increasing with time. And if you want a ceasefire to protect civilian lives and for humanitarian reasons, there's no guarantee the ceasefire would be respected by Russia anyway.
And if the war goes on for a few more months, Russia will run out of ammo way before the West.
Last edited by Barzotti; 2022-03-23 at 11:27 AM.
The Russian army is in a worse state then the Ukraine army at this point. Ukraine is being supplied better then the Russian army thanks to Western aid.
There are more Russian army elements cut off from supply lines then Ukraine elements.
A cease fire is objectively better for the Russian army then the Ukrainian army at this point.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
not really. The Russian army is not performing well but it is taking ground (it will probably end up taking all of donbass). It's combat effectiveness isn't great at the moment but its pulling battalions from elsewhere to replenish its forces. It still has alot of military power it can bring down.
How anyone living in a NATO country can fear Russia, especially after the pathetic shitshow they've pulled of in Ukraine, is beyond me.
Suggesting that Ukraine should go for peace for 5 years, and let Russia come back with refined tactics, makes zero sense either. If Ukraine would prefere to lose with less devastation, they would surrender.
This is not a soccer match, there's no half time peptalk, and suddenly team Russia is like a new team. The equipment that the Stingers and Javelin take it, takes longer to replace. Russia is not sitting on endless equipment.
Poland has expelled 45 Russian diplomats accused of spying.
Ask the Polish government who was too afraid to give Ukraine Mig-29s how they can fear Russia.
Perhaps no country should fear the US after the debacle of Afghanistan? Oh wait.
Perhaps Ukraine should have kept fighting in 2014 instead of signing Minsk. I am sure things would have worked well for them. You know in the same year they were getting their asses handed to them.Suggesting that Ukraine should go for peace for 5 years, and let Russia come back with refined tactics, makes zero sense either. If Ukraine would prefere to lose with less devastation, they would surrender.
Oh wait they didn't keep fighting, they accepted a ceasefire that was constantly broken that gave them 8 years to train, equip and modernize their military, which has allowed them in conjunction with Russia's poor military plans to hold for a month.
It will not last.
But hey when Ukraine runs out of Javelins, Stingers, artillery shells and even assault rifle rounds that the west cannot replenish for them because we have neither the munition stocks or supply chain at this time and the remnants of their air defenses and air forces are left completely inoperable I am absolutely certain things will go well for them. Ukraine CANNOT sustain this level of fighting given their munition stocks and the west cannot make up for it in the short term: We are already running out of ammo to send them for the AT and AA infantry systems.
On top that how do you suppose those munition stocks even reach the Ukrainian front lines in Donbass, Chernhiv and Sumy? Kiev has one major road remaining and about two weeks left of food ( the food aspect is according to their mayor ).
Russia may have issues getting the ammo to their troops in the field, but they absolutely have the necessary stocks to keep going for a very very long time.
In short we need time. Time to get the supply chains going, time to give Ukraine ammo and heavy military equipment, time to train to use that equipment and time for the sanctions to work. We have the resources to make this far more difficult for Russia then it has been over the last few weeks, but not instantly: It will take the west and Ukraine years.
Because a Ukraine with far more powerful military might not even be invaded because it would be too bloody costly for Russia.
But nevermind that, we're on a trip in Disneyland according to people like you. Enjoy the sightseeing, not that any of you lot would ever dare step foot in eastern europe to help the refugees, let alone heading to Ukraine to help there.
Last edited by CostinR; 2022-03-23 at 12:43 PM.
"Life is one long series of problems to solve. The more you solve, the better a man you become.... Tribulations spawn in life and over and over again we must stand our ground and face them."
Someone appears to have thrown a molotov at the walls of the Kremlin. Poor bugger is going to be falling out of a window soon.
Um...the US and allies invading Afghanistan was not the shitshow you're suggesting. The occupation, absolutely, complete fucking disaster, but the invasion itself went smoothly. This line makes as little sense as living in a NATO country and being worried Russia will invade...after Ukraine.
So because there's a limit to what kind of weapons we'll deliver, NATO countries should be fearful of Russia? Sound logic mate. There's a difference on provoking a war with Russia, and beeing superior in one.
And wtf does a occupation against insurgents have to potential war with Russia?
Where do you compare NATO military stocks vs Russian?
Your end comment is just sheer stupidity. No one is enjoying this, regardless if we disagree with you.
Edit: Keep in mind that one of Russias demands is the demilitarization of Ukraine, how do you figure out that we'll have years to arm Ukraine?
Last edited by Crispin; 2022-03-23 at 01:10 PM.
The way that whole giving MiGs to Ukraine affair went tells me it wouldn't matter whether Ukrainian pilots could have been trained to fly western jets in the years prior, cause the west would be just as reluctant to supply Ukraine with those too.
If training were the only issue at hand there, those old MiGs countries such as Poland have in stockpiles would already be in Ukrainian hands making sorties against the Russians, but the initial transfer didn't even happen. There's a reason for why Poland wanted to give them to the US first as a middleman for transferring to Ukraine.
How's that? By praying for swift Russian victory since day 1 of the invasion? Ring any bells? Yup, sounds very difficult for Russia, for their targets to roll over and surrender immediately.
It's rich that someone is talking of disney and looney tunes rides, a month into invasion that they've been praying had ended in the first days; in Russias complete victory (as that was the only way it was ever going to happen, regardless of which words you want to dress it up as).