NATO could have backed off back in December. Or pushed for Ukraine to implement Minsk-2. Just an idea.
Western choices have consequences; and so do Russian.
What makes you think that way?And yes. We can afford higher energy bills. You, however, cannot afford us no longer buying from you, which this all leads to.
As long as we have things world needs there will be those willing to trade for them; and Russia isn't going to sit and wait until Europeans finish the switch.
it's just really impolite to be having an extensive, serious conversation and then abruptly segue to mocking someone merely because their perception of time is different.
"Truth...justice, honor, freedom! Vain indulgences, every one(...) I know what I want, and I take it. I take advantage of whatever I can, and discard that which I cannot. There is no room for sentiment or guilt."
You mean the same one that keeps turning the raping, pillaging RuZlamist terrorists into turdpiles by the tens of thousands?
How's it working out for you?
- - - Updated - - -
Not just time, but perception of reality is also completely different.
Cute victim blaming. Had the USSR just handed over their weapons to the Nazi's, then you wouldnt have lost milions of your people, lol idiots! You brought it upon yourself!
You seem to not realise, that you'll sooner than later find yourself without the majority of your rich customers, and be selling your oil at an even greater discount than you do now.
Also oil prices dropped today. add the Russian discount increasing
Last edited by Crispin; 2022-06-20 at 11:00 AM.
Well I guess that NATO could stop you from raping civilians, but it wont happen since NATO is a defensive pact.
It must be a real mindfuck to you, that NATO havent used the Ukraine war as an excuse to beat the living shit out of Russia? It's after all the Evul NATO invaders expansion you used as an excuse to invade Ukraine.
Apparently NATO were never interested in a war with Russia after all, everone but Russians arent surprised.
I think you'll find Russia is the toddler running around smashing things here. The whole "acting on your emotions" thing is weapon grade projection.
Suggesting that Ukraine should have negotiated a better deal for peace with Russia than the last one is also hilarious. That would be the deal that Russia broke by invading? That they signed up to in order to strip Ukraine of nuclear weapons, with no intention of honouring it?
There is no point making deals with Russia, they are criminals and gangsters. The only thing they understand is a foot on the throat. Hopefully, with western help, Ukraine will apply that foot.
When challenging a Kzin, a simple scream of rage is sufficient. You scream and you leap.
Originally Posted by George CarlinOriginally Posted by Douglas Adams
What are you even trying to say, lol. The problem we are "incapable of solving" is Russia with a maniac and warmonger leading it and degenerates like you supporting him. Whether it's Moldavia or Ukraine, the problem is in the East.
The problem is Putin and his irrational believe and wish to recreate the Soviet Union.
Who the heck is acting on emotion again? Because it certainly wasn't the "West" when Russia invaded Ukraine.
You always seem to paint the picture that the west did something first. But the fact remains, Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around.
Last edited by KrayZ33; 2022-06-20 at 12:33 PM.
Point of order, we don't know if russia signed it in good faith in the nineties or not, putin came to power well after that was done so there is a non-zero percent chance that the russian government back then had every intent of keeping the agreement. Let's not mix up the timelines. Besides, while the nukes were on Ukrainian soil I've been led to believe that there wasn't much they could do with them at the time as the codes were held in moscow anyway.
Not saying I trust putin but he wasn't a factor at the time.